Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 476.52 (2026)

Management efficiency

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. It is the policy of this state that a public utility shall operate in an efficient manner.

2. If the commission determines in the course of a proceeding conducted under section 476.3 or 476.6 that a utility is operating in an inefficient manner, or is not exercising ordinary, prudent management, or in comparison with other utilities in the state the commission determines that the utility is performing in a less beneficial manner than other utilities, the commission may reduce the level of profit or adjust the revenue requirement for the utility to the extent the commission believes appropriate to provide incentives to the utility to correct its inefficient operation.

3. If the commission determines in the course of a proceeding conducted under section 476.3 or 476.6 that a utility is operating in such an extraordinarily efficient manner that tangible financial benefits result to the ratepayer, the commission may increase the level of profit or adjust the revenue requirement for the utility.

4. In making its determination under this section, the commission may also consider a public utility’s pursuit of energy efficiency programs. The commission shall adopt rules for determining the level of profit or the revenue requirement adjustment that would be appropriate. The commission shall also adopt rules establishing a methodology for an analysis of a utility’s management efficiency. 83 Acts, ch 127, §35; 89 Acts, ch 297, §11; 2018 Acts, ch 1041, §99; 2024 Acts, ch 1170, §369 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–1990 · leading case: Off. of Consum. Advocate v. Iowa State Com. Comm'n, 432 N.W.2d 148 (Iowa 1988).
Off. of Consum. Advocate v. Iowa State Com. Comm'n, 432 N.W.2d 148 (Iowa 1988). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 476.52 (board has authority to penalize *155 utility company not providing just and reasonable rates).”
Off. of Consum. Advocate v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 454 N.W.2d 883 (Iowa 1990). · cites it 8× “The board granted a portion of the rate increase and also allowed Interstate an additional increase as a reward for management efficiency under Iowa Code section 476.52 (1987). The Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petitioned for judicial review, and Interstate filed its own…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.