Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 478.4 (2026)

Franchise — hearing

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The utilities commission shall consider the petition and any objections filed to the petition in the manner provided. The commission shall examine the proposed route or cause any engineer selected by the commission to do so. If a hearing is held on the petition, the commission may hear testimony as may aid the commission in determining the propriety of granting the franchise. The commission may grant the franchise in whole or in part upon the terms, conditions, and restrictions, and with the modifications as to location and route as may seem to the commission just and proper. Before granting the franchise, the utilities commission shall make a finding that the proposed line or lines are necessary to serve a public use and represents a reasonable relationship to an overall plan of transmitting electricity in the public interest. A franchise shall not become effective until the petitioners shall pay, or file an agreement to pay, all costs and expenses of the franchise proceeding, whether or not objections are filed, including costs of inspections or examinations of the route, hearing, salaries, publishing of notice, and any other expenses reasonably attributable to the franchise proceeding. The funds received for the costs and the expenses of the franchise proceeding shall be remitted to the treasurer of state for deposit in the commerce revolving fund created in section 546.12 as provided in section 476.10. [S13, §2120-n; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §8312, 8313; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, §489.4, 489.5; C66, 71, 73, 75, §489.4; C77, 79, 81, §478.4] 87 Acts, ch 234, §431; 94 Acts, ch 1107, §82; 2009 Acts, ch 181, §53; 2023 Acts, ch 19, §2689; 2024 Acts, ch 1170, §369; 2025 Acts, ch 30, §78 Referred to in §476.10, 478.1, 478.6A, 478.13 Section amended

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1979–2023 · leading case: S.E. Iowa Coop. Elec. Ass'n v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 633 N.W.2d 814 (Iowa 2001).
S.E. Iowa Coop. Elec. Ass'n v. Iowa Utils. Bd., 633 N.W.2d 814 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 30× “” Iowa Code § 478.4 ; Fischer, 368 N.W.2d at 97 .”
Fischer v. Iowa Sate Com. Comm'n, 368 N.W.2d 88 (Iowa 1985). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 478.4 . Petitioner, within the time for filing objections to the project and nearly two months prior to the initial hearing date, advised the commission in writing of his objections to the project based upon his belief that it would fill no current or accurately…”
Se Iowa Co-op. Elec. v. Iowa Util. Bd., 633 N.W.2d 814 (Iowa 2001). · cites it 30× “" Iowa Code § 478.4 ; Fischer, 368 N.W.2d at 97 .”
Clark v. Iowa State Com. Comm'n, 286 N.W.2d 208 (Iowa 1979). · cites it 4× “§ 478.4. In the present appeal we face questions relating only to the Boone County and Dallas County segments.”
Linda K. Juckette v. Iowa Utils. Bd. & MidAmerican Energy Co. & Off. of Consum. Advocate (Iowa 2023). · cites it 12× “Among other things, Juckette contended that 6 MidAmerican had failed to meet Iowa Code section 478.4’s requirement that new transmission lines must be necessary for a public use.”
Linda K. Juckette v. Iowa Utils. Bd. & MidAmerican Energy Co. & Off. of Consum. Advocate (Iowa 2023). · cites it 12× “Among other things, Juckette contended that 6 MidAmerican had failed to meet Iowa Code section 478.4’s requirement that new transmission lines must be necessary for a public use.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.