The affixing of a seal to a record evidencing a contract for sale or an offer to buy or sell
goods does not constitute the record a sealed instrument and the law with respect to sealed
instruments does not apply to such a contract or offer.
[C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §9932; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, §554.3; C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §554.2203]
2024 Acts, ch 1023, §19
\n
Notes of Decisions
Warder & Lee Elevator, Inc. v. Britten, 274 N.W.2d 339 (Iowa 1979).
· cites it 2× “"The Statute was designed as the weapon of the written law to prevent frauds; the doctrine of estoppel is that of the unwritten law to prevent a like evil." Id. at 797-798. We have found no reported decision in any jurisdiction holding that the statute of frauds in the Uniform…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.