Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 554.8106 (2026)

Control

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A purchaser has “control” of a certificated security in bearer form if the certificated security is delivered to the purchaser. 2. A purchaser has “control” of a certificated security in registered form if the certificated security is delivered to the purchaser, and: a. the certificate is indorsed to the purchaser or in blank by an effective indorsement; or b. the certificate is registered in the name of the purchaser, upon original issue or registration of transfer by the issuer. 3. A purchaser has “control” of an uncertificated security if: a. the uncertificated security is delivered to the purchaser; or b. the issuer has agreed that it will comply with instructions originated by the purchaser without further consent by the registered owner.

\n

Tue Dec 09 22:02:41 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 554 (108, 4) §554.8106, UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE 128\n\n 4. A purchaser has “control” of a security entitlement if: a. the purchaser becomes the entitlement holder; b. the securities intermediary has agreed that it will comply with entitlement orders originated by the purchaser without further consent by the entitlement holder; or c. another person, other than the transferor to the purchaser of an interest in the security entitlement: (1) has control of the security entitlement and acknowledges that it has control on behalf of the purchaser; or (2) obtains control of the security entitlement after having acknowledged that it will obtain control of the security entitlement on behalf of the purchaser. 5. If an interest in a security entitlement is granted by the entitlement holder to the entitlement holder’s own securities intermediary, the securities intermediary has control. 6. A purchaser who has satisfied the requirements of subsection 3 or 4 has control, even if the registered owner in the case of subsection 3, or the entitlement holder in the case of subsection 4, retains the right to make substitutions for the uncertificated security or security entitlement, to originate instructions or entitlement orders to the issuer or securities intermediary, or otherwise to deal with the uncertificated security or security entitlement. 7. An issuer or a securities intermediary may not enter into an agreement of the kind described in subsection 3, paragraph “b”, or subsection 4, paragraph “b”, without the consent of the registered owner or entitlement holder, but an issuer or a securities intermediary is not required to enter into such an agreement even though the registered owner or entitlement holder so directs. An issuer or securities intermediary that has entered into such an agreement is not required to confirm the existence of the agreement to another party unless requested to do so by the registered owner or entitlement holder. 8. A person that has control under this section is not required to acknowledge that it has control on behalf of a purchaser. 9. If a person acknowledges that it has or will obtain control on behalf of a purchaser, unless the person otherwise agrees or law other than this Article or Article 9 otherwise provides, the person does not owe any duty to the purchaser and is not required to confirm the acknowledgment to any other person. [C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §554.8106] 89 Acts, ch 113, §5; 96 Acts, ch 1138, §14, 84; 2000 Acts, ch 1149, §150, 187; 2002 Acts, ch 1119, §87; 2024 Acts, ch 1023, §34, 35 Referred to in §554.8102, 554.8107, 554.8510, 554.9106, 554.9208, 554.9328

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2008 · leading case: In Re W. Iowa Limestone, Inc., 538 F.3d 858 (8th Cir. 2008).
In Re W. Iowa Limestone, Inc., 538 F.3d 858 (8th Cir. 2008). “See Iowa Code § 554.8106 cmt. 7. The comment provides that “[i]n particular, the requirements for ‘possession’ derived from the common law of pledge are not to be used as a basis for interpreting subsection (c)(2) or (d)(2)” of § 554.”
United Bank of Iowa v. Indep. Inputs (8th Cir. 2008). “See Iowa Code § 554.8106 cmt. 7. The comment provides that "[i]n particular, the requirements for 'possession' derived from the common law of pledge are not to be used as a basis for interpreting subsection (c)(2) or (d)(2)" of § 554.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.