Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 554.9304 (2026)

Law governing perfection and priority of security interests in deposit accounts

✓ Iowa Code 2026 (laws through the 2025 session)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. Law of bank’s jurisdiction governs. The local law of a bank’s jurisdiction governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in a deposit account maintained with that bank even if the transaction does not bear any relation to the bank’s jurisdiction.

2. Bank’s jurisdiction. The following rules determine a bank’s jurisdiction for purposes of this part:

a. If an agreement between the bank and the debtor governing the deposit account expressly provides that a particular jurisdiction is the bank’s jurisdiction for purposes of this part, this Article, or this chapter, that jurisdiction is the bank’s jurisdiction.

b. If paragraph “a” does not apply and an agreement between the bank and its customer governing the deposit account expressly provides that the agreement is governed by the law of a particular jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is the bank’s jurisdiction.

c. If neither paragraph “a” nor paragraph “b” applies and an agreement between the bank and its customer governing the deposit account expressly provides that the deposit account is maintained at an office in a particular jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is the bank’s jurisdiction.

d. If none of the preceding paragraphs applies, the bank’s jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the office identified in an account statement as the office serving the customer’s account is located.

e. If none of the preceding paragraphs applies, the bank’s jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the chief executive office of the bank is located. 2000 Acts, ch 1149, §24, 185, 187; 2024 Acts, ch 1023, §55 Referred to in §554.1301, 554.9301 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1990–1990 · leading case: Cedar Rapids Meats, Inc. v. Hager (In re Cedar Rapids Meats, Inc.), 121 B.R. 562 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1990).
Cedar Rapids Meats, Inc. v. Hager (In re Cedar Rapids Meats, Inc.), 121 B.R. 562 (Bankr. N.D. Iowa 1990). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 554.9304 (1) (UCC § 9-304(1)) provides in relevant part that “a security interest in money or instruments .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.