Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 614.25 (2026)

Effect of filing claim

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The filing of such claim shall extend for a further period of twenty-one years the time within which such action may be brought by any person entitled thereto, and successive claims for further like extensions may be filed. [C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §614.25] Referred to in §455I.9, 457A.2, 614.26, 614.27, 614.28

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2023 · leading case: Fjords North, Inc. v. Hahn, 710 N.W.2d 731 (Iowa 2006).
Fjords North, Inc. v. Hahn, 710 N.W.2d 731 (Iowa 2006). “§ 614.25 (“The filing of such claim shall extend for a further period of twenty-one years the time within which such action may be brought by any person entitled thereto, and successive claims for further like extensions may be filed.”
Compiano v. Jones, 269 N.W.2d 459 (Iowa 1978). “Plaintiffs argue further that it was defendants’ duty to see the instrument was properly indexed and that they must bear the consequences for failing to do so. Although admitting the instrument purporting to extend the use restrictions was not indexed as the statute directs,…”
Beaver Creek Fourth Addition Homeowners Ass'n, Inc., D/B/A Beaver Hollow Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Arthur John Vander Zee & Jennifer Vander Zee (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 614.25 ; Fjords N., 710 N.W.2d at 735 (explaining that restrictive covenants are contracts covered by section 614.”
Gene L. Franklin & Connie Johnson, Executors of the Fae Black Est. Gene L. Franklin, Connie Johnson, Curtis L. Franklin, & Gregory S. Franklin, plaintiffs-appellees/cross-appellants v. Michael Johnston, Elizabeth Johnston, Steve Johnston, Kasondra Johnston, James Yeager, & Judith Yeager, defendants-appellants/cross-appellees. (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “2d 731, 735 (Iowa 2006) (citing Iowa Code § 614.25 ). The purpose of the statute was to simplify land transfers by “shortening the title- search period for these types of claims” but allowing for these claims to be kept alive if desired.”
Shri Lambodara, Inc. v. Parco, Ltd. (Iowa Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “We, like the district court found and a commentator suggests, believe this language is outdated in light of the 2014 amendments to Iowa Code section 614.25. The analysis required by that section turns on whether a covenant 6 is an easement or a “use restriction.”
Fjords North, Inc., Vs. Randy Hahn, Susan Hahn & H & H Homebuilders (Iowa 2006). “§ 614.25 (“The filing of such claim shall extend for a further period of twenty-one years the time within which such action may be brought by any person entitled thereto, and successive claims for further like extensions may be filed.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.