1. The determination of incompetency of the adult respondent to a petition for guardianship or conservatorship or an adult subject to guardianship or conservatorship shall be supported by clear and convincing evidence.
2. The burden of persuasion is on the petitioner in an initial proceeding to appoint a guardian or conservator. In a proceeding to modify or terminate a guardianship or conservatorship, if the guardian or conservator is the petitioner, the burden of persuasion remains with the guardian or conservator. In a proceeding to terminate a guardianship or conservatorship, if the protected person is the petitioner, the protected person shall make a prima facie showing of some decision-making capacity. Once a prima facie showing is made, the burden of persuasion is on the guardian or conservator to show by clear and convincing evidence that the protected person is incompetent.
3. In determining whether a guardianship or conservatorship is to be established, modified, or terminated, the district court shall consider if a limited guardianship or conservatorship pursuant to section 633.635 or 633.637 is appropriate. In making the\n\nTue Dec 09 21:59:22 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 633 (154, 4) 111 PROBATE CODE, §633.554\n\ndetermination, the court shall make findings of fact to support the powers conferred on the guardian or conservator.
4. In proceedings to establish, modify, or terminate a guardianship or conservatorship, in determining if the respondent or protected person is incompetent as defined in section 633.3, the court shall consider credible evidence as to whether there are other less restrictive alternatives, including third-party assistance, that would meet the needs of the respondent or the protected person. However, neither party to the action shall have the burden to produce such evidence relating to other less restrictive alternatives, including but not limited to third-party assistance.
5. Except as otherwise provided in sections 633.672 and 633.673, in proceedings to establish a guardianship or conservatorship, the costs, including attorney fees, court visitor fees, and expert witness fees, shall be assessed against the respondent or the respondent’s estate unless the proceeding is dismissed either voluntarily or involuntarily, in which case fees and costs may be assessed against the petitioner for good cause shown.
6. Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, the Iowa rules of civil procedure shall govern proceedings to establish, modify, or terminate a guardianship or conservatorship. 97 Acts, ch 178, §4; 2007 Acts, ch 134, §15, 28; 2019 Acts, ch 57, §9, 43, 44; 2020 Acts, ch 1062, §66 Referred to in §633.552, 633.553, 633.635, 633.675, 633.717\n\n PART 2 APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIANS AND CONSERVATORS — MEDIATION IN GUARDIANSHIPS AND CONSERVATORSHIP ACTIONS \n
Notes of Decisions
Elyse De Stefano v. Apts. Downtown, Inc., 879 N.W.2d 155 (Iowa 2016).
· cites it 2× “§§ 633.551(5), .673 (assessing the costs, including attorney fees, of a guardianship against ward or ward’s estate); id.”
In re the Guardianship of M.D., 797 N.W.2d 121 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 633.551 (1). The burden requires proof that the natural parent is not a qualified or suitable caregiver.”
Ernst v. Grap, 799 N.W.2d 549 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 633.551(5) provides that when a petition to establish a guardianship is dismissed, attorney fees may be assessed against the petitioner “for good cause shown.”
Cory Joseph Maruna v. Kimberly R. Harper, No. 15-1899, 2016 WL 5930881 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2016).
· cites it 7× “See Iowa Code § 633.551 (2). Section 633.551(3) gives the district court, rather than the ward, authority to determine the scope of the guardianship in deciding whether a guardianship should be terminated.”
In the Matter of the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Denise Louise Evans, Ward. Denise Louise Evans, Ward-Appellant., No. 16-2192, 2017 WL 4570438 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 11, 2017).
· cites it 5× “7 See Iowa Code §§ 633.551 , .552, .556. To meet this burden, the proponent of the guardianship and conservatorship must show: In the case of a conservatorship the impairment must be such that the proposed ward “is unable to make, communicate, or carry out important decisions…”
In the Interest of the Guardianship & Conservatorship of S.M.P., 972 N.W.2d 214 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 5× “” Iowa Code § 633.551 (2). The district court must “find[ ] by clear and convincing evidence” that “[t]he decision-making capacity of the respondent is so impaired that the respondent is unable to care for the respondent’s safety, or to provide for necessities such as food,…”
Iowa Code § 633.551(1): 5 cases
Iowa Code § 633.551(2): 1 case
Cory Joseph Maruna v. Kimberly R. Harper, No. 15-1899, 2016 WL 5930881 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2016).
“See Iowa Code § 633.551 (2). Section 633.551(3) gives the district court, rather than the ward, authority to determine the scope of the guardianship in deciding whether a guardianship should be terminated.”
Iowa Code § 633.551(3): 4 cases
Cory Joseph Maruna v. Kimberly R. Harper, No. 15-1899, 2016 WL 5930881 (Iowa Ct. App. Oct. 12, 2016).
“See Iowa Code § 633.551 (2). Section 633.551(3) gives the district court, rather than the ward, authority to determine the scope of the guardianship in deciding whether a guardianship should be terminated.”
Iowa Code § 633.551(4): 3 cases
In the Interest of the Guardianship & Conservatorship of S.M.P., 972 N.W.2d 214 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021).
“” Iowa Code § 633.551 (2). The district court must “find[ ] by clear and convincing evidence” that “[t]he decision-making capacity of the respondent is so impaired that the respondent is unable to care for the respondent’s safety, or to provide for necessities such as food,…”
Iowa Code § 633.551(5): 10 cases
Ernst v. Grap, 799 N.W.2d 549 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011).
“Iowa Code section 633.551(5) provides that when a petition to establish a guardianship is dismissed, attorney fees may be assessed against the petitioner “for good cause shown.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.