Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 664A.5 (2026)

Modification — entry of permanent no-contact order

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a defendant is convicted of, receives a deferred judgment for, or pleads guilty to a public offense referred to in section 664A.2, subsection 1, or is held in contempt for a violation of a no-contact order issued under section 664A.3 or for a violation of a protective order issued pursuant to chapter 232, 235F, 236, 236A, 598, or 915, the court shall either terminate or modify the temporary no-contact order issued by the magistrate. The court may enter a no-contact order or continue the no-contact order already in effect for a period of five years from the date the judgment is entered or the deferred judgment is granted, regardless of whether the defendant is placed on probation. 2006 Acts, ch 1101, §9; 2007 Acts, ch 180, §7; 2014 Acts, ch 1107, §25; 2017 Acts, ch 121, §31 Referred to in §664A.3, 708.2A, 708.2D, 726.24, 726.25

\n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34 cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: TSB Holdings, L.L.C. & 911 N. Governor, L.L.C. v. City of Iowa City, Iowa, 913 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2018).
TSB Holdings, L.L.C. & 911 N. Governor, L.L.C. v. City of Iowa City, Iowa, 913 N.W.2d 1 (Iowa 2018). · cites it 3× “In yet another example, section 664A.5 specifically limits the duration of a permanent no-contact order to "five years from the date the judgment is entered or the deferred judgment is granted.”
State of Iowa v. Joshua Scott Pearson, 876 N.W.2d 200 (Iowa 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 664A.5; id. § 692A.104; id. § 901.5(8A)(a); id.”
Dakota, Minnesota & E. R.R. D/B/A Canadian Pac. v. Iowa Dist. Court for Louisa Cnty., 898 N.W.2d 127 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 2× “, Iowa Code § 664A.5 (limiting the duration of a permanent no-contact order to “five years from the date the judgment is entered”); Bear v.”
State of Iowa v. Jessica Epping, 878 N.W.2d 277 (Iowa Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 10× “Iowa Code § 664A.5. Here, the no-contact order was entered pursuant to Epping’s criminal sentence, and therefore was in compliance with this section.”
Larry Shawn Whitwer v. Civil Serv. Comm'n of the City of Sioux City, Iowa, 897 N.W.2d 112 (Iowa 2017). · cites it 2× “§ 664A.5. On September 26, the day after Whitwer pled guilty, he was placed on administrative leave from the fire department, with pay, and a predisciplinary hearing was scheduled for October 5.”
State of Iowa v. Timothy Lee Hall Jr. (Iowa 2026). · cites it 26× “Next, Iowa Code section 664A.5 authorizes the sort of permanent no- contact order at issue here.”
State of Iowa v. Jesse Arnold Hunter (Iowa Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 14× “See Iowa Code § 664A.5. Next Hunter argues the district court was required to make fact- findings or explain its reasoning for entering the permanent no-contact order.”
State of Iowa v. Keith Lynch (Iowa Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 11× “Iowa Code § 664A.3(1). Second, chapter 664A authorizes the court to enter a 6 permanent no-contact order not to exceed five years in duration if the defendant is convicted of a covered offense.”
State of Iowa v. Christopher Lee Johnson (Iowa Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 10× “8; the court modified an existing, temporary no- contact order under section 664A.5. Iowa Code section 664A.5 states: If a defendant is convicted of .”
State of Iowa v. J. Doe (Iowa Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 6× “See Iowa Code § 664A.5 (2021) (permitting the sentencing court to issue a no- contact order at the time of sentencing “for a period of five years”).”
Troy Daniel Dowell v. State of Iowa, 922 N.W.2d 104 (Iowa Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Iowa Code § 664A.5 (2013). If a no-contact order is issued or continued as part of the sentencing proceedings for a defendant, the defendant is entitled to challenge the legality of the no-contact order as part of a challenge to the legality of the sentence.”
State of Iowa v. John Michael Olney (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “Iowa Code §§ 664A.5, .8. Accordingly, orders entered under chapter 664A are akin to temporary injunctions, except no further disposition is intended—although five-year extensions are permitted.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.