1. An appeal may be taken from:
a. An order denying an application to compel arbitration made under section 679A.2.
b. An order granting an application to stay arbitration made under section 679A.2,
subsection 2.
c. An order confirming or denying confirmation of an award.
d. An order modifying or correcting an award.
e. An order vacating an award without directing a rehearing.
f. A judgment or decree entered pursuant to the provisions of this chapter.
2. The appeal shall be taken in the manner and to the same extent as from orders or
judgments in a civil action.
[C51, §2112; R60, §3689; C73, §3429; C97, §4399; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, §12708; C46, 50, 54,
58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §679.14; 81 Acts, ch 202, §17]
C83, §679A.17
\n
Notes of Decisions
Wesley Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc., 594 N.W.2d 22 (Iowa 1999).
· cites it 9× “Because the district court’s ruling on HLM’s motion to compel arbitration was not a final order or judgment and because orders compelling arbitration are not ap-pealable under section 679A.17, Wesley cannot appeal as a matter of right.”
Ales v. Anderson, Gabelmann, Lower & Whitlow, P.C., 728 N.W.2d 832 (Iowa 2007).
· cites it 4× “Kendall is not supported by substantial evidence; and (3) the district court erred in granting AGLW’s application for partial vacation of the award for attorney’s fees and costs. III.”
Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co. v. Simoni, 641 N.W.2d 807 (Iowa 2002).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 679A.17(1) provides for an appeal as of right from "[a]n order denying an application to compel arbitration made under section 679A.”
$99 Down Payment, Inc. v. Garard, 592 N.W.2d 691 (Iowa 1999).
· cites it 4× “It maintains the district court order improperly inquired into the merits-of the dispute, failed to give proper deference to the arbitrator’s findings, and applied an improper standard of review under Iowa Code section 679A.11 (1997). II. Standard of Review. This case is on…”
Heaberlin Farms, Inc. v. IGF Ins. Co., 641 N.W.2d 816 (Iowa 2002).
· cites it 2× “In January 2000 Hea-berlin commenced this breach-of-contract action against IGF for failing to pay its claim.”
Humphreys v. Joe Johnston Law Firm, P.C., 491 N.W.2d 513 (Iowa 1992).
· cites it 2× “We review the district court decision as provided by Iowa Code section 679A.17(2). Because this is an appeal from a court order in a civil law suit, our review is for correction of error.”
Penford Prods. Co. v. C.J. Schneider Eng'g Co., 808 N.W.2d 443 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011).
· cites it 2× “It found there was no privity between Penford and Lexington that would require Penford to arbitrate with Lexington. Therefore, the court denied Lexington’s motion to dismiss, or stay and compel arbitration.”
Fell P'ship v. Heartland Co-Op (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).
· cites it 8× “However, Iowa Code section 679A.17(1) (2016) makes a clear distinction between such motions in stating: An appeal may be taken from: a.”
Mut. Serv. Cas. Ins. Co. v. Iowa Dist. Court for Woodbury Cnty., 372 N.W.2d 261 (Iowa 1985).
· cites it 2× “Although an order staying arbitration proceedings or denying an application to compel arbitration is specifically made appealable by Iowa Code section 679A.17, it is unclear whether appeal may be had from an order compelling arbitration.”
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(1) — 3 cases
Wesley Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc., 594 N.W.2d 22 (Iowa 1999).
“Because the district court’s ruling on HLM’s motion to compel arbitration was not a final order or judgment and because orders compelling arbitration are not ap-pealable under section 679A.17, Wesley cannot appeal as a matter of right.”
Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co. v. Simoni, 641 N.W.2d 807 (Iowa 2002).
“Iowa Code section 679A.17(1) provides for an appeal as of right from "[a]n order denying an application to compel arbitration made under section 679A.”
Fell P'ship v. Heartland Co-Op (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).
“However, Iowa Code section 679A.17(1) (2016) makes a clear distinction between such motions in stating: An appeal may be taken from: a.”
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(1)(a) — 5 cases
Fell P'ship v. Heartland Co-Op (Iowa Ct. App. 2017).
“However, Iowa Code section 679A.17(1) (2016) makes a clear distinction between such motions in stating: An appeal may be taken from: a.”
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(1)(c) — 2 cases
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(2) — 11 cases
Ales v. Anderson, Gabelmann, Lower & Whitlow, P.C., 728 N.W.2d 832 (Iowa 2007).
“Kendall is not supported by substantial evidence; and (3) the district court erred in granting AGLW’s application for partial vacation of the award for attorney’s fees and costs. III.”
Humphreys v. Joe Johnston Law Firm, P.C., 491 N.W.2d 513 (Iowa 1992).
“We review the district court decision as provided by Iowa Code section 679A.17(2). Because this is an appeal from a court order in a civil law suit, our review is for correction of error.”
$99 Down Payment, Inc. v. Garard, 592 N.W.2d 691 (Iowa 1999).
“It maintains the district court order improperly inquired into the merits-of the dispute, failed to give proper deference to the arbitrator’s findings, and applied an improper standard of review under Iowa Code section 679A.11 (1997). II. Standard of Review. This case is on…”
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(l)(a) — 2 cases
Wesley Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc., 594 N.W.2d 22 (Iowa 1999).
“Because the district court’s ruling on HLM’s motion to compel arbitration was not a final order or judgment and because orders compelling arbitration are not ap-pealable under section 679A.17, Wesley cannot appeal as a matter of right.”
Penford Prods. Co. v. C.J. Schneider Eng'g Co., 808 N.W.2d 443 (Iowa Ct. App. 2011).
“It found there was no privity between Penford and Lexington that would require Penford to arbitrate with Lexington. Therefore, the court denied Lexington’s motion to dismiss, or stay and compel arbitration.”
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(l)(c) — 2 cases
Ales v. Anderson, Gabelmann, Lower & Whitlow, P.C., 728 N.W.2d 832 (Iowa 2007).
“Kendall is not supported by substantial evidence; and (3) the district court erred in granting AGLW’s application for partial vacation of the award for attorney’s fees and costs. III.”
$99 Down Payment, Inc. v. Garard, 592 N.W.2d 691 (Iowa 1999).
“It maintains the district court order improperly inquired into the merits-of the dispute, failed to give proper deference to the arbitrator’s findings, and applied an improper standard of review under Iowa Code section 679A.11 (1997). II. Standard of Review. This case is on…”
— Iowa Code § 679A.17(l)(f) — 1 case
Wesley Ret. Servs., Inc. v. Hansen Lind Meyer, Inc., 594 N.W.2d 22 (Iowa 1999).
“Because the district court’s ruling on HLM’s motion to compel arbitration was not a final order or judgment and because orders compelling arbitration are not ap-pealable under section 679A.17, Wesley cannot appeal as a matter of right.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.