1. Any person who serves or is employed by the state or a political subdivision of the state shall not engage in any of the following conduct:
a. Outside employment or an activity that involves the use of the state’s or the political subdivision’s time, facilities, equipment, and supplies or the use of the state or political subdivision badge, uniform, business card, or other evidences of office or employment to give the person or member of the person’s immediate family an advantage or pecuniary benefit that is not available to other similarly situated members or classes of members of the general public. This paragraph does not apply to off-duty peace officers who provide private duty security or fire fighters or emergency medical care providers certified under chapter 147A who provide private duty fire safety or emergency medical services while carrying their badge or wearing their official uniform, provided that the person has secured the prior approval of the agency or political subdivision in which the person is regularly employed to engage in the activity. For purposes of this paragraph, a person is not “similarly situated” merely by being or being related to a person who serves or is employed by the state or a political subdivision of the state.
b. Outside employment or an activity that involves the receipt of, promise of, or acceptance of money or other consideration by the person, or a member of the person’s immediate family, from anyone other than the state or the political subdivision for the performance of any act that the person would be required or expected to perform as a part of the person’s regular duties or during the hours during which the person performs service or work for the state or political subdivision of the state.
c. Outside employment or an activity that is subject to the official control, inspection, review, audit, or enforcement authority of the person, during the performance of the person’s duties of office or employment. \n Tue Dec 09 22:30:34 2025 Iowa Code 2026, Chapter 68B (42, 1) 5 GOVERNMENT ETHICS AND LOBBYING, §68B.3\n\n 2. If the outside employment or activity is employment or activity described in subsection 1, paragraph “a” or “b”, the person shall immediately cease the employment or activity. If the outside employment or activity is employment or activity described in subsection 1, paragraph “c”, or constitutes outside employment or an activity prohibited under rules adopted pursuant to subsection 4 or under the senate or house codes of ethics, unless otherwise provided by law, the person shall take one of the following courses of action:
a. Cease the outside employment or activity.
b. Publicly disclose the existence of the conflict and refrain from taking any official action or performing any official duty that would detrimentally affect or create a benefit for the outside employment or activity. For purposes of this paragraph, “official action” or “official duty” includes but is not limited to participating in any vote, taking affirmative action to influence any vote, granting any license or permit, determining the facts or law in a contested case or rulemaking proceeding, conducting any inspection, or providing any other official service or thing that is not available generally to members of the public in order to further the interests of the outside employment or activity.
3. Unless otherwise specifically provided the requirements of this section shall be in addition to, and shall not supersede, any other rights or remedies provided by law.
4. The board shall adopt rules pursuant to chapter 17A further delineating particular situations where outside employment or activity of officials and state employees of the executive branch will be deemed to create an unacceptable conflict of interest. 93 Acts, ch 163, §2; 95 Acts, ch 41, §1; 2008 Acts, ch 1191, §38; 2009 Acts, ch 9, §1, 2, 6 Referred to in §68B.34 Incompatibility of offices, see Iowa Constitution, Art. III, §21 and 22 and §39.11 and 39.12 Economic development and conflict disclosure, see §15A.2 \n
Notes of Decisions
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
· cites it 37× “Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
T & K Roofing Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Educ., 593 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 1999).
· cites it 22× “An unsuccessful bidder on a school roofing project appeals from a district court ruling affirming the State Board of Education decision finding the school district substantially complied with the competitive bidding statute and no conflict of interest existed in violation of…”
State v. Knowles, 602 N.W.2d 800 (Iowa 1999).
· cites it 2× “25: In addition to any penalty contained in any other provision of law, a person who knowingly and intentionally violates a provision of sections 68B.2A through 68B.7, sections 68B.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(1) — 2 cases
T & K Roofing Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Educ., 593 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 1999).
“An unsuccessful bidder on a school roofing project appeals from a district court ruling affirming the State Board of Education decision finding the school district substantially complied with the competitive bidding statute and no conflict of interest existed in violation of…”
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(1)(6) — 1 case
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(1)(a) — 1 case
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(1)(b) — 2 cases
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(2) — 1 case
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(2)(2009) — 1 case
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(3) — 1 case
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(S) — 1 case
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(l)(a) — 2 cases
Iowa Farm Bureau Fed'n, Iowa Renewable Fuels Ass'n, & Iowa Water Env't Ass'n, 850 N.W.2d 403 (Iowa 2014).
“Yet, unlike the underlying statute in Wilson, section 68B.2A does not prohibit members of commissions from voting if they have an unacceptable conflict as defined in subsections (1)(a) and (b); instead, it merely requires the official to “cease the employment or activity.”
T & K Roofing Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Educ., 593 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 1999).
“An unsuccessful bidder on a school roofing project appeals from a district court ruling affirming the State Board of Education decision finding the school district substantially complied with the competitive bidding statute and no conflict of interest existed in violation of…”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(l)(b) — 1 case
T & K Roofing Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Educ., 593 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 1999).
“An unsuccessful bidder on a school roofing project appeals from a district court ruling affirming the State Board of Education decision finding the school district substantially complied with the competitive bidding statute and no conflict of interest existed in violation of…”
— Iowa Code § 68B.2A(l)(c) — 1 case
T & K Roofing Co. v. Iowa Dep't of Educ., 593 N.W.2d 159 (Iowa 1999).
“An unsuccessful bidder on a school roofing project appeals from a district court ruling affirming the State Board of Education decision finding the school district substantially complied with the competitive bidding statute and no conflict of interest existed in violation of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.