Iowa Code
Iowa Code § 7.9 (2026)
Federal funds accepted
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The governor is authorized to accept for the state, the funds provided by any Act of Congress for the benefit of the state of Iowa, or its political subdivisions, provided there is no agency to accept and administer such funds, and the governor is authorized to administer or designate an agency to administer the funds until such time as an agency of the state is established for that purpose. [C66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §7.9]
\nNotes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases, 1988–2018 · leading case: Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chem., Inc., 613 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa 2000).
Fitzgerald v. Salsbury Chem., Inc., 613 N.W.2d 275 (Iowa 2000). “, Employee Dismissal Law and Practice § 7.9, at 18 (4th ed.1998) [hereinafter Perritt]; Paul H.”
Terri Aleta Rivera v. Woodward Resource Ctr. & State of Iowa, 865 N.W.2d 887 (Iowa 2015). “2; see also Perritt I § 7.9, at 17–19; Henry H. Perritt, Jr., The Future of Wrongful Dismissal Claims: Where Does Employer Self Interest Lie?, 58 U.”
Clinton Physical Therapy Servs., P.C. v. John Deere Health Care, Inc., 714 N.W.2d 603 (Iowa 2006). “Allan Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.9, at 458 (3d ed.1999). To reveal this intent, extrinsic evidence is admissible “ ‘when it sheds light on the situation of the parties, antecedent negotiations, the attendant circumstances, and the objects they were striving to attain.”
Dutrac Cmty. Credit Union & Kwik Trip, Inc. v. Radiology Grp. Real Est., L.C., Shamrock Props., L.C. Duffy Fam. Ltd. P'ship Bigger Better Betty Bldg., L.L.C. & Quad City Oms, L.C., 891 N.W.2d 210 (Iowa 2017). “Allan Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.9, at 458 (3d ed. 1999)). To the extent necessary to reveal the parties’ intent, extrinsic evidence is admissible.”
Mercer v. City of Cedar Rapids, 104 F. Supp. 2d 1130 (N.D. Iowa 2000). “See PeRRItt § 7.9, at 18. This is a helpful guide and actually parallels the approach we have followed in addressing the tort on a case-by-case method.”
Schaer v. Webster Cnty., 644 N.W.2d 327 (Iowa 2002). “2d 810, 814 (1990); see II Farnsworth, § 7.9, at 266-67. Yet, “mutual assent is based on objective evidence, not on the hidden intent of the parties.”
Raymond v. U.S.A. Healthcare Ctr.-Fort Dodge, L.L.C., 468 F. Supp. 2d 1047 (N.D. Iowa 2006). “See Perritt § 7.9, at 18. This is a helpful guide and actually parallels the approach we have followed in addressing the tort on a case-by-case method.”
Hunter v. Bd. of Trs., 481 N.W.2d 510 (Iowa 1992). “Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.9, at 255 (“[I]f parties attach different meanings to language, the court’s task is .”
Harker's Distrib., Inc. v. Reinhart Foodservice, L.L.C., 597 F. Supp. 2d 926 (N.D. Iowa 2009). “2 Farnsworth on Contracts §§ 7.9, 7.10 (3d ed. 2004), a view followed in Illinois; Horbach v.”
Kallich v. North Iowa Anesthesia Assocs., P.C., 179 F. Supp. 2d 1043 (N.D. Iowa 2002). “See Perritt § 7.9, at 18. This is a helpful guide and actually parallels the approach we have followed in addressing the tort on a case-by-case method.”
McGee v. Damstra, 431 N.W.2d 375 (Iowa 1988). “Interpretation cannot turn on meanings that the parties attached if they attached none, but must turn on the meaning that reasonable persons in the positions of the parties would have attached if they had given the matter thought.”
Amended May 15, 2017 Dutrac Cmty. Credit Union & Kwik Trip, Inc. v. Radiology Grp. Real Est., L.C. Shamrock Props., L.C. Duffy Fam. Ltd. P'ship Bigger Better Betty Bldg., L.L.C. & Quad City OMS, L.C. (Iowa 2017). “Allan Farnsworth, Contracts § 7.9, at 458 (3d ed. 1999)). To the extent necessary to reveal the parties’ intent, extrinsic evidence is admissible.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.