1. a. A person commits an act of hazing when the person intentionally or recklessly engages in any act or acts involving forced activity which endanger the physical health or safety of a student for the purpose of initiation or admission into, or affiliation with, any organization operating in connection with a school, college, or university. Prohibited acts include, but are not limited to, any brutality of a physical nature such as whipping, forced confinement, or any other forced activity which endangers the physical health or safety of the student.
b. For purposes of this section, “forced activity” means any activity which is a condition of initiation or admission into, or affiliation with, an organization, regardless of a student’s willingness to participate in the activity.
2. A person who commits an act of hazing is guilty of a simple misdemeanor.
3. A person who commits an act of hazing which causes serious bodily injury to another is guilty of a serious misdemeanor. 89 Acts, ch 41, §1 \n
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
17
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1957–2021 · leading case:
State v. Warner, 229 N.W.2d 776 (Iowa 1975).
State v. Warner, 229 N.W.2d 776 (Iowa 1975).
· cites it 8× “November 5, 1973, a county attorney's information was filed in the Scott district court charging Wayne Lee Warner with attempting to break and enter a storage and transfer company in which goods, merchandise and valuable things were kept for use, sale or deposit with intent to…”
Jensen v. State, 312 N.W.2d 581 (Iowa 1981).
· cites it 4× “Defendant pleaded guilty in January 1980 to charges of attempting to break and enter, a violation of section 708.10, The Code 1975; conspiracy to kidnap for ransom, section 719.”
State v. Morelock, 164 N.W.2d 819 (Iowa 1969).
· cites it 4× “Section 708.10, Code of Iowa, 1966, provides in part as follows: “If any person, with intent to commit any public offense, shall attempt to break *822 and enter * * * any * * * store * * * or any building in which any goods, merchandise, or valuable things are kept for use,…”
State v. Harless, 86 N.W.2d 210 (Iowa 1957).
· cites it 2× “A jury found defendant guilty of the crime of attempting to break and enter in violation of section 708.10, Code, 1954, and of being a habitual criminal as defined by section 747.”
State v. Hansen, 221 N.W.2d 274 (Iowa 1974).
· cites it 2× “A Polk County grand jury indicted this defendant for attempting to break and enter, a violation of § 708.10, The Code. Following his plea of guilty he was sentenced to serve an indeterminate sentence not exceeding five years in the state men’s reformatory.”
State v. Fox, 159 N.W.2d 492 (Iowa 1968).
· cites it 4× “A county attorney’s information filed July 11, 1967, charged defendant William Bud Fox with the crime of attempting to break and enter the Coffee Cup Cafe in Oskaloosa, Iowa on the morning of July 6, 1967 with intent to commit larceny in vio *493 lation of section 708.10 of the…”
Watts v. State, 257 N.W.2d 70 (Iowa 1977).
“The petitioner Watts was originally charged with the crime of breaking and entering, but as the result of a plea bargaining arrangement he entered a plea of guilty to the crime of attempting to break and enter in violation of § 708.10, The Code. Time was fixed for the imposition…”
State v. Jones, 281 N.W.2d 13 (Iowa 1979).
“This defendant appeals from a conviction of attempting to break and enter in violation of § 708.10, The Code 1977, claiming that (1) the trial court was without authority to hold court outside the courthouse and by so doing denied him his right to a public trial; (2) he was…”
State v. Davis, 175 N.W.2d 407 (Iowa 1970).
· cites it 2× “Defendant was thereafter indicted, tried, convicted *408 and sentenced to a period of not to exceed five years in the men’s reformatory for the crime of attempting to break and enter in violation of Code section 708.10. He has appealed. We affirm.”
State v. Gardner, 274 N.W.2d 328 (Iowa 1979).
“See § 708.10, The Code 1977. However, this sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on probation for two years.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.