Iowa Code

Iowa Code § 717A.3B (2026)

Agricultural production facility trespass

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IA-LEGlegis.iowa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1. A person commits agricultural production facility trespass if the person does any of the following:

a. Uses deception as described in section 702.9, subsection 1 or 2, on a matter that would reasonably result in a denial of access to an agricultural production facility that is not open to the public, and, through such deception, gains access to the agricultural production facility, with the intent to cause physical or economic harm or other injury to the agricultural production facility’s operations, agricultural animals, crop, owner, personnel, equipment, building, premises, business interest, or customer.

b. Uses deception as described in section 702.9, subsection 1 or 2, on a matter that would reasonably result in a denial of an opportunity to be employed at an agricultural production facility that is not open to the public, and, through such deception, is so employed, with the intent to cause physical or economic harm or other injury to the agricultural production facility’s operations, agricultural animals, crop, owner, personnel, equipment, building, premises, business interest, or customer.

2. A person who commits agricultural production facility trespass is guilty of a serious misdemeanor for a first offense and an aggravated misdemeanor for a second or subsequent offense.

3. A person who conspires with another, as described in section 706.1, to commit agricultural production facility trespass is guilty of a serious misdemeanor for a first offense and an aggravated misdemeanor for a second or subsequent offense. For purposes of this subsection, a person commits conspiracy to commit agricultural production facility trespass, without regard to the limitation of criminal liability for conspiracy otherwise applicable under section 706.1, subsection 1. 2019 Acts, ch 3, §1, 2 \n

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Kimberly Reynolds, 89 F.4th 1065 (8th Cir. 2024).
Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Kimberly Reynolds, 89 F.4th 1065 (8th Cir. 2024). · cites it 4× “Iowa Code § 717A.3B(1)(a)-(b) (2019). After several organizations challenged the new law, the district court concluded that the intent requirement renders the law “viewpoint-based” and unconstitutional under the First Amendment.”
— Iowa Code § 717A.3B(1)(a) — 1 case
Animal Legal Def. Fund v. Kimberly Reynolds, 89 F.4th 1065 (8th Cir. 2024). “Iowa Code § 717A.3B(1)(a)-(b) (2019). After several organizations challenged the new law, the district court concluded that the intent requirement renders the law “viewpoint-based” and unconstitutional under the First Amendment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.