1. a. “Parole” is the release of a person who has been committed to the custody of the director of the Iowa department of corrections by reason of the person’s commission of a public offense, which release occurs prior to the expiration of the person’s term, is subject to supervision by the district department of correctional services, and is on conditions imposed by the district department.
b. “Work release” is the release of a person, who has been committed to the custody of the director of the Iowa department of corrections, pursuant to sections 904.901 through 904.909.
2. A person who has been released on parole or work release may be temporarily assigned to the supervision of the director of the department of corrections as a result of placement in a violator facility established pursuant to section 904.207. [C79, 81, §906.1] 83 Acts, ch 96, §143, 159; 86 Acts, ch 1245, §1518; 93 Acts, ch 46, §10; 2018 Acts, ch 1041, §118 Referred to in §904.207 \n
Notes of Decisions
State v. Anderson, 782 N.W.2d 155 (Iowa 2010).
· cites it 2× “Iowa Code section 906.1 defines parole as “the release of a person .”
State v. Washington, 356 N.W.2d 192 (Iowa 1984).
· cites it 2× “8 precludes imposition of a suspended sentence in this case by stating: "A person sentenced as an habitual offender shall not be eligible for parole until he or she has served the minimum sentence of confinement of three years.”
State v. Morehouse, 316 N.W.2d 884 (Iowa 1982).
· cites it 2× “Parole, as defined by section 906.1, is the release of a person already committed to custody.”
State v. DeWitt, 426 N.W.2d 678 (Iowa Ct. App. 1988).
· cites it 4× “” Iowa Code § 906.1 (1987). However, the "release” that statute speaks of is release from confinement; it does not refer to release from custody from the department.”
State v. Anderson, 836 N.W.2d 669 (Iowa Ct. App. 2013).
· cites it 6× “) Parole is defined in section 906.1 as follows: Parole is the release of a person who has been committed to the custody of the director of the Iowa department of corrections by reason of the person’s commission of a public offense, which release occurs prior to the expiration…”
State v. Finchum, 364 N.W.2d 222 (Iowa 1985).
· cites it 2× “Cited for this proposition is the statutory definition of parole given in section 906.1 of the Iowa Code Supplement of 1983: Parole is the release of a person who has been committed to the custody of the director of the Iowa department of corrections by reason of the person’s…”
State v. Orte, 540 N.W.2d 435 (Iowa 1995).
· cites it 2× “See Iowa Code § 906.1 . Because of the delayed mittimus, Orte would have to serve all of the remaining eight months of his drug sentence.”
Coleman v. Iowa Dist. Court for Linn Cnty., 446 N.W.2d 806 (Iowa 1989).
· cites it 2× “” Iowa Code § 906.1 (1987). As long as Coleman’s status fell within this definition, the board of parole was authorized by statute to release him from custody on such conditions as it may impose.”
Popejoy v. State, 727 N.W.2d 383 (Iowa Ct. App. 2006).
“§ 906.1 (providing that “parole ... is subject to supervision by the district department of correctional services,” and that “work release is .”
State v. Washington, 356 N.W.2d 192 (Iowa 1984).
· cites it 2× “8 precludes imposition of a suspended sentence in this case by stating: “A person sentenced as an habitual offender shall not be eligible for parole until he or she has served the minimum sentence of confinement of three years.”
State of Iowa v. Iowa Dist. Court for Jasper Cnty. (Iowa Ct. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “1 and being under the supervision and conditions imposed by the district department of correctional services under section 906.1(1)(a), the Board of Parole, not the DOC, has the power to enforce parole conditions.”
— Iowa Code § 906.1(1)(a) — 1 case
State of Iowa v. Iowa Dist. Court for Jasper Cnty. (Iowa Ct. App. 2021).
“1 and being under the supervision and conditions imposed by the district department of correctional services under section 906.1(1)(a), the Board of Parole, not the DOC, has the power to enforce parole conditions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.