History:
L. 1957, ch. 145, § 18; L. 1969, ch. 117, § 2; L. 1978, ch. 74, § 1; L. 1984, ch. 313, § 54; L. 1985, ch. 88, § 5; Repealed, L. 2004, ch. 154, § 65; July 1, 2005.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; arbitrary power not vested in commissioner to prosecute violations of securities act. State v. Hodge, 204 Kan. 98, 110, 460 P.2d 596.
2. Cited; purpose of act explained; sale of "activator kits" constitutes sale of investment contracts (K.S.A. 17-1252(j)). Activator Supply Co. v. Wurth, 239 Kan. 610, 614, 621, 722 P.2d 1081 (1986).
3. Corporation soliciting shareholders' group to purchase Canadian lottery tickets and share winnings as constituting securities sales examined. 537721 Ontario, Inc. v. Mays, 14 Kan. App. 2d 1, 780 P.2d 1126 (1989).
Activator Supply Co. v. Wurth, 722 P.2d 1081 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 2דASC and CFI appealed to the district court pursuant to K.S.A. 17-1269. The district court afforded the parties a hearing and, on July 1, 1985, filed its memorandum opinion and order upholding the permanent cease and desist order of the commissioner and vacating its prior order…”
537721 Ontario, Inc. v. Mays, 780 P.2d 1126 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “K.S.A. 17-1269 instructs that review of a final order of the *2 Securities Commissioner should be taken in accordance with the act for judicial review and civil enforcement of agency actions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.