History:
L. 1957, ch. 145, § 19; L. 1969, ch. 117, § 3; L. 1973, ch. 309, § 5; L. 1978, ch. 74, § 2; L. 1978, ch. 308, § 44; L. 1978, ch. 75, § 1; L. 1979, ch. 61, § 7; L. 1981, ch. 299, § 44; L. 1982, ch. 98, § 10; L. 1984, ch. 87, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 226, § 6; L. 1997, ch. 62, § 11; L. 2002, ch. 17, § 8; Repealed, L. 2004, ch. 154, § 65; July 1, 2005.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Validity and effect of administrative regulation K.S.A. 81-1-1 adopted under subsection (f) of this section considered. Allen v. Schauf, 202 Kan. 348, 356, 449 P.2d 1010.
2. Subsection (a) cited; arbitrary power not vested in commissioner to prosecute violations of securities act. State v. Hodge, 204 Kan. 98, 99, 109, 460 P.2d 596.
3. Subsection (f) cited; no error by trial court in excluding testimony not relevant in securities fraud case. State v. Puckett, 6 Kan. App. 2d 688, 697, 634 P.2d 144 (1981).
State v. Puckett, 640 P.2d 1198 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 2ד" See K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 17-1270( f ). Furthermore, defendant's reliance on K.”
State Ex Rel. Brant v. Bank of Am., 31 P.3d 952 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 2דK.S.A. 2000 Supp. 17-1270. "The purpose of the Kansas Securities Act is to place the traffic of promoting and dealing in speculative securities under rigid governmental regulation and control to protect investors, thereby preventing, so far as possible, the sale of fraudulent…”
State v. Atteberry, 239 P.3d 857 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “81-5-11(2006); see K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 17-1270(e) (granting commissioner authority to adopt, amend, and revoke rules and regulations, orders, and forms “as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of [the] act” and allowing commissioner, in carrying out these duties, to…”
K.S.A. § 17-1270(e): 1 case
State v. Atteberry, 239 P.3d 857 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “81-5-11(2006); see K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 17-1270(e) (granting commissioner authority to adopt, amend, and revoke rules and regulations, orders, and forms “as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of [the] act” and allowing commissioner, in carrying out these duties, to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.