Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 2-606 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

2-606.

History: L. 1915, ch. 166, § 6; R.S. 1923, § 2-606; Repealed, L. 1951, ch. 8, § 12; January 1, 1952.


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2006–2006 · leading case: Scotwood Indus., Inc. v. Frank Miller & Sons, Inc., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (D. Kan. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Scotwood Indus., Inc. v. Frank Miller & Sons, Inc., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (D. Kan. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 84-2-606: Applying this definition, the court finds that, under § 2-606(l)(c) at the very least, Miller and Sons accepted the calcium chloride flake because it processed many of the shipments it received from Scot-wood and then sold this processed material on its own behalf.”
K.S.A. § 2-606(l)(c): 1 case
Scotwood Indus., Inc. v. Frank Miller & Sons, Inc., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1160 (D. Kan. 2006). “§ 84-2-606: Applying this definition, the court finds that, under § 2-606(l)(c) at the very least, Miller and Sons accepted the calcium chloride flake because it processed many of the shipments it received from Scot-wood and then sold this processed material on its own behalf.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.