K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-2437 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-2437.

History: L. 1907, ch. 186, § 1; R.S. 1923, 21-2437; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4701; July 1, 1970.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1968–2014 · leading case: State v. Williams, 324 P.3d 1078 (Kan. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Williams, 324 P.3d 1078 (Kan. 2014). “2d 999 (1967), in which the charge was possession of burglary tools in violation of K.S.A. 21-2437 (Corrick). In response to the defendant’s claim that one of the tools was found on his companion and hence was inadmissible as to him, the Hart *555 court said that possession of…”
State v. Thompson, 701 P.2d 694 (Kan. 1985). “The defendant claimed that the statute was so vague and ambiguous that men of ordinary understanding or common intelligence could only guess at the meaning and differ as to its application, and that it lacked the first essential of due process since the statute did not require…”
State v. Motion Picture Entitled\ the Bet\"", 547 P.2d 760 (Kan. 1976). “K.S.A. 21-2437 (relating to possession of burglary tools) was construed to require proof of intent to employ tools in the course of burglarious episodes, whenever and wherever opportunity might present itself.”
Chester A. Schutz v. United States, 432 F.2d 25 (10th Cir. 1970). · cites it 2× “Schütz urges that the warrant was invalid because the tools described in the application for the warrant were not burglar’s tools within the meaning of K.S.A. 21-2437. We cannot agree with this argument because in the first place K.”
State v. McDonald, 445 P.2d 345 (Wash. 1968). “2d 999 (1967), in which the Kansas court said: The conduct forbidden by K.S.A. 21-2437 is the possession (or making, mending, etc.”
In re the Marriage of Riggs, 129 P.3d 601 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). ““K.S.A. 21-2437 (relating to possession of burglary tools) was construed to require proof of intent to employ tools in the course of burglarious episodes, whenever and wherever opportunity might present itself.”
State v. Smith, 446 P.2d 4 (Ariz. 1968). “) * * * ” The constitutionality of a Kansas statute, K.S.A. 21-2437, was attacked in the case of State v.”
Collins v. State, 463 P.2d 1018 (Kan. 1970). · cites it 2× ““In count 3 you are charged with the offense of possession of burglary tools; *620 an offense commonly known as possession of burglary tools; in violation of Section 21-2437 of the General Statutes of Kansas.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.