Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-2803 (2026)

Trading stamp act inapplicable to certain coupons and similar devices

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-2803. Trading stamp act inapplicable to certain coupons and similar devices. This act shall not apply to any coupon, ticket, certificate, card or other similar device which is issued, distributed, furnished or redeemed:

(a) By a manufacturer or packer, when such coupon, ticket, certificate, card or other similar device is redeemable:

(1) Without or with accompanying cash, for any product of the manufacturer or packer or for one specified and particular product not manufactured or packed by the manufacturer or packer; or

(2) by the manufacturer or packer in cash.

(b) By a retailer, when such coupon, ticket, certificate, card or other similar device is redeemable by the retailer, with or without accompanying cash, for any product which the retailer normally sells in its usual course of business.

(c) By a person, firm, association or corporation, when such coupon, ticket, certificate, card or other similar device is redeemable, with or without accompanying cash, for air travel, hotel, motel and similar accommodations, vehicle rental or other travel or recreational services.

History: L. 1957, ch. 177, § 3; L. 1979, ch. 91, § 1; L. 1992, ch. 90, § 1; April 23.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1983–1983 · leading case: State ex rel. Stephan v. Pepsi-Cola Gen. Bottlers, Inc., 659 P.2d 213 (Kan. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State ex rel. Stephan v. Pepsi-Cola Gen. Bottlers, Inc., 659 P.2d 213 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 3× “The appellant’s primary argument is the trial court erred in its construction of K.S.A. 21-2803, which provides certain exceptions to the prohibitions found in the Trading Stamp Act.”

State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Pepsi-cola Gen'l Bottlers, Inc, 659 P.2d 213 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 3× “The appellant's primary argument is the trial court erred in its construction of K.S.A. 21-2803, which provides certain exceptions to the prohibitions found in the Trading Stamp Act.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.