History:
L. 2006, ch. 194, § 2; L. 2007, ch. 169, § 1; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited; court discusses both subjective and objective tests for justifiable use of force. McCracken v. Kohl, 286 Kan. 1114, 1116, 1117, 1120, 1122, 191 P.3d 313 (2008).
State v. Ultreras, 295 P.3d 1020 (Kan. 2013). · cites it 35דThe opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam: This appeal raises first-impression issues regarding the burden of proof when a criminal defendant asserts immunity from criminal prosecution under the justified use of force provisions of K.S.A. 21-3219. We hold that the…”
State v. Barlow, 368 P.3d 331 (Kan. 2016). · cites it 15דIn Ultreras , defendant Manuel Ultreras had filed a pretrial motion to dismiss in which he claimed Stand-Your-Ground immunity under K.S.A. 21-3219, the designation of the current statute before a 2011 recodification of our criminal procedure statutes.”
State v. Jones, 311 P.3d 1125 (Kan. 2013). · cites it 28דHe argues for the first time on appeal that under Kansas’ version of a “Stand-Your-Ground Law” in effect at the time of the crime, K.S.A. 21-3219, he is immune from prosecution.”
McCracken v. Kohl, 191 P.3d 313 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 6ד: Gary Lloyd McCracken appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he sought immunity from prosecution for multiple counts of aggravated battery based upon the self-defense provisions of K.S.A. 21-3219. The district court found…”
The State of Wyoming v. Jason Tsosie John, 2020 WY 46 (Wyo. 2020). “Common law principles consistent with the statutory “[t]he only standard of proof referenced in K.S.A. 21-3219 is to the standard of probable cause” and rejecting the preponderance of the evidence standard adopted by the Colorado Supreme Court, whose statute “makes no mention of…”
State v. Hunter (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2דIn this respect, the State is merely asking this court to determine whether the district court erred when it refused to address the applicability of K.S.A. 21-3219, and this court is not to entertain such an argument under these circumstances.”
McKinnis v. State (Kan. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2ד21-5231, formerly K.S.A. 21-3219. He claimed counsel failed to request discovery which would have located the gun the aggressor had.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3219(a) — 3 cases
State v. Jones, 311 P.3d 1125 (Kan. 2013). “He argues for the first time on appeal that under Kansas’ version of a “Stand-Your-Ground Law” in effect at the time of the crime, K.S.A. 21-3219, he is immune from prosecution.”
State v. Ultreras, 295 P.3d 1020 (Kan. 2013). “The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam: This appeal raises first-impression issues regarding the burden of proof when a criminal defendant asserts immunity from criminal prosecution under the justified use of force provisions of K.S.A. 21-3219. We hold that the…”
State v. Barlow, 368 P.3d 331 (Kan. 2016). “In Ultreras , defendant Manuel Ultreras had filed a pretrial motion to dismiss in which he claimed Stand-Your-Ground immunity under K.S.A. 21-3219, the designation of the current statute before a 2011 recodification of our criminal procedure statutes.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3219(b) — 2 cases
State v. Ultreras, 295 P.3d 1020 (Kan. 2013). “The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam: This appeal raises first-impression issues regarding the burden of proof when a criminal defendant asserts immunity from criminal prosecution under the justified use of force provisions of K.S.A. 21-3219. We hold that the…”
State v. Jones, 311 P.3d 1125 (Kan. 2013). “He argues for the first time on appeal that under Kansas’ version of a “Stand-Your-Ground Law” in effect at the time of the crime, K.S.A. 21-3219, he is immune from prosecution.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3219(c) — 2 cases
State v. Ultreras, 295 P.3d 1020 (Kan. 2013). “The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam: This appeal raises first-impression issues regarding the burden of proof when a criminal defendant asserts immunity from criminal prosecution under the justified use of force provisions of K.S.A. 21-3219. We hold that the…”
State v. Barlow, 368 P.3d 331 (Kan. 2016). “In Ultreras , defendant Manuel Ultreras had filed a pretrial motion to dismiss in which he claimed Stand-Your-Ground immunity under K.S.A. 21-3219, the designation of the current statute before a 2011 recodification of our criminal procedure statutes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.