Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 21-3505 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
21-3505.
History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-3505; L. 1983, ch. 109, § 5; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 23; L. 1993, ch. 253, § 6; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44
cases, 1978–2018 · leading case: State v. Coman, 273 P.3d 701 (Kan. 2012).
State v. Coman, 273 P.3d 701 (Kan. 2012). “Analysis As we have indicated, K.S.A. 21-3505 lists three forms of criminal sodomy: “(a) Criminal sodomy is: (1) Sodomy between persons who are 16 or more years of age and members of the same sex or between a person and an animal; (2) Sodomy with a child who is 14 or more years…”
State v. Coman, 214 P.3d 1198 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Among the specific crimes is subsection (c)(4), "criminal sodomy as defined in subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of K.S.A. 21-3505 and amendments thereto." Coman's principal argument on appeal is that the legislative omission of subsection (a)(1) of K.”
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “21-3505(a)(2) is gender neutral. It prohibits sodomy with a child within the stated age limitations without regard to the age of the offender or to the sex of the participants.”
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 21-3505. There is no dispute as to the evidence offered in support of the criminal sodomy charge.”
State v. Fitzgerald, 423 P.3d 497 (Kan. 2018). “at 686 (quoting K.S.A. 21-3505[a][3]). On appeal, Dickson argued the evidence to convict him of this version of criminal sodomy was insufficient.”
State v. Dubish, 675 P.2d 877 (Kan. 1984). “The defendant argues first that he cannot be convicted of aggravated sodomy because he was still married to the victim at *712 the time the alleged offense occurred; that K.S.A. 21-3505 does not permit a husband to be convicted of committing the crime of sodomy or aggravated…”
State v. Franco, 319 P.3d 551 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “See K.S.A. 21-3505 (criminal sodomy). At trial, Franco neither requested the instructions nor objected to the district court’s failure to give them.”
State v. Kleypas, 40 P.3d 139 (Kan. 2001). “21-3502 and amendments thereto, criminal sodomy, as defined in subsections (a)(2) or (a)(3) of K.S.A. 21-3505 and amendments thereto or aggravated criminal sodomy, as defined in K.”
Jegley v. Picado, 80 S.W.3d 332 (Ark. 2002). “Nine states and Puerto Rico maintain statutes prohibiting same-sex and opposite-sex sodomy: Alabama-Ala.”
State v. Smith, 766 So. 2d 501 (La. 2000). “02 (West 1993); Idaho Code § 18-6605 (Michie 1993); Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-3505 (1989); La.Rev.”
State v. Limon, 122 P.3d 22 (Kan. 2005). “Limón turned 18 years of age just 1 week before the incident; his date of birth is February 9, 1982.”
State v. Moyer, 410 P.3d 71 (Kan. 2015). “21-3504(a)(1) (sexual intercourse with a child who is 14 or more years of age but less than 16 years of age), and three counts of criminal sodomy in violation of K.S.A. 21-3505(a)(2) (sodomy with a child who is 14 or more years of age but less than 16 years of age).”
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(1) — 1 case
State v. William, 807 P.2d 1292 (Kan. 1991).
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(a) — 5 cases
State v. Thurber, 420 P.3d 389 (Kan. 2018).
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 21-3505. There is no dispute as to the evidence offered in support of the criminal sodomy charge.”
State v. Coman, 214 P.3d 1198 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Among the specific crimes is subsection (c)(4), "criminal sodomy as defined in subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of K.S.A. 21-3505 and amendments thereto." Coman's principal argument on appeal is that the legislative omission of subsection (a)(1) of K.”
State v. Johnson, 156 P.3d 596 (Kan. 2007).
State v. Dickson, 46 P.3d 1216 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(a)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Coman, 214 P.3d 1198 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Among the specific crimes is subsection (c)(4), "criminal sodomy as defined in subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of K.S.A. 21-3505 and amendments thereto." Coman's principal argument on appeal is that the legislative omission of subsection (a)(1) of K.”
State v. Franco, 319 P.3d 551 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “See K.S.A. 21-3505 (criminal sodomy). At trial, Franco neither requested the instructions nor objected to the district court’s failure to give them.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(a)(2) — 14 cases
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “21-3505(a)(2) is gender neutral. It prohibits sodomy with a child within the stated age limitations without regard to the age of the offender or to the sex of the participants.”
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 21-3505. There is no dispute as to the evidence offered in support of the criminal sodomy charge.”
State v. Limon, 122 P.3d 22 (Kan. 2005). “Limón turned 18 years of age just 1 week before the incident; his date of birth is February 9, 1982.”
State v. Moyer, 410 P.3d 71 (Kan. 2015). “21-3504(a)(1) (sexual intercourse with a child who is 14 or more years of age but less than 16 years of age), and three counts of criminal sodomy in violation of K.S.A. 21-3505(a)(2) (sodomy with a child who is 14 or more years of age but less than 16 years of age).”
State v. Coman, 273 P.3d 701 (Kan. 2012). “Analysis As we have indicated, K.S.A. 21-3505 lists three forms of criminal sodomy: “(a) Criminal sodomy is: (1) Sodomy between persons who are 16 or more years of age and members of the same sex or between a person and an animal; (2) Sodomy with a child who is 14 or more years…”
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(a)(3) — 5 cases
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 21-3505. There is no dispute as to the evidence offered in support of the criminal sodomy charge.”
State v. Fitzgerald, 423 P.3d 497 (Kan. 2018). “at 686 (quoting K.S.A. 21-3505[a][3]). On appeal, Dickson argued the evidence to convict him of this version of criminal sodomy was insufficient.”
State v. Johnson, 156 P.3d 596 (Kan. 2007).
State v. Johnson, 122 P.3d 397 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).
State v. Dickson, 46 P.3d 1216 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(a)(l) — 3 cases
State v. Coman, 273 P.3d 701 (Kan. 2012). “Analysis As we have indicated, K.S.A. 21-3505 lists three forms of criminal sodomy: “(a) Criminal sodomy is: (1) Sodomy between persons who are 16 or more years of age and members of the same sex or between a person and an animal; (2) Sodomy with a child who is 14 or more years…”
State v. Coman, 214 P.3d 1198 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Among the specific crimes is subsection (c)(4), "criminal sodomy as defined in subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of K.S.A. 21-3505 and amendments thereto." Coman's principal argument on appeal is that the legislative omission of subsection (a)(1) of K.”
State v. Franco, 319 P.3d 551 (Kan. Ct. App. 2014). “See K.S.A. 21-3505 (criminal sodomy). At trial, Franco neither requested the instructions nor objected to the district court’s failure to give them.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(b) — 2 cases
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “21-3505(a)(2) is gender neutral. It prohibits sodomy with a child within the stated age limitations without regard to the age of the offender or to the sex of the participants.”
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 21-3505. There is no dispute as to the evidence offered in support of the criminal sodomy charge.”
— K.S.A. § 21-3505(c) — 3 cases
State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “21-3505(a)(2) is gender neutral. It prohibits sodomy with a child within the stated age limitations without regard to the age of the offender or to the sex of the participants.”
State v. Dickson, 69 P.3d 549 (Kan. 2003). “” K.S.A. 21-3505. There is no dispute as to the evidence offered in support of the criminal sodomy charge.”
State v. Coman, 214 P.3d 1198 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Among the specific crimes is subsection (c)(4), "criminal sodomy as defined in subsection (a)(2) and (a)(3) of K.S.A. 21-3505 and amendments thereto." Coman's principal argument on appeal is that the legislative omission of subsection (a)(1) of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.