Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4202 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4202.

History: L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4202; L. 1970, ch. 124, § 7; L. 1992, ch. 298, § 68; L. 1993, ch. 291, § 147; L. 1994, ch. 291, § 40; L. 1994, ch. 348, § 2; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1975–2012 · leading case: State v. Sanders, 904 P.2d 951 (Kan. 1995).
State v. Sanders, 904 P.2d 951 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 4× “21-3401) and aggravated weapons violation (K.S.A. 21-4202) and the sentence imposed.”
City of Junction City v. Lee, 532 P.2d 1292 (Kan. 1975). · cites it 5× “He lifts that adjectival term from the following judicial council comment quoted immediately after K.S.A. 21-4202: "These sections are the first sections of a comprehensive weapons control act.”
State v. Sanders, 949 P.2d 1084 (Kan. 1997). · cites it 3× “21-3401) and an aggravated weapons violation (K.S.A. 21-4202 [Ensley 1988]). We reversed Sanders’ prior convictions on these charges stemming from the 1993 killing of Latonya Edmond in State v.”
State v. Roose, 203 P.3d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 22× “Roose was charged under K.S.A. 21-4202, which deals with aggravated weapons violations.”
State v. Hooker, 21 P.3d 964 (Kan. 2001). “21-4204, instead of K.S.A. 21-4202. The incorrect citation was repeated in the journal entry.”
State v. Hoskins, 565 P.2d 608 (Kan. 1977). · cites it 3× “21-4201[l][d]) and aggravated weapons violation (K.S.A. 21-4202). The appellant was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm.”
State v. Vanwey, 941 P.2d 365 (Kan. 1997). “Facts On March 26, 1992, Vanwey pled guilty to charges of an aggravated weapons violation, K.S.A. 21-4202- (Ensley 1988), a class E felony; criminal trespass, K.”
State v. LaGrange, 279 P.3d 105 (Kan. 2012). “We arrive at the same conclusion as the Court of Appeals majority with respect to the meaning of the released from prison phrase in K.S.A. 21-4202(a)(4)(A), i.e., “such felony” identifies both the listed Kansas felonies and the substantially similar out-of-state felonies.”
City of Junction City v. Cadoret, 946 P.2d 1356 (Kan. 1997). “This intent is also expressed in K.S.A. 21-4202 and K.S.A. 21-4204, where those who have been convicted of nonperson felonies, or equivalents from other jurisdictions, are barred from possessing weapons and firearms for 5 years following their conviction.”
State v. Denney, 905 P.2d 657 (Kan. 1995). “Here, Denney did not testify, and die prior crimes evidence is admissible under K.S.A. 1993 Supp. 21-4202. Properly analyzed, the cornerstone of the Roth rule requiring a limiting instruction is not K.”
Sullivan v. State, 564 P.2d 455 (Kan. 1977). “When the car was stopped petitioner and two other men emerged.”
State v. Wright, 557 P.2d 1267 (Kan. 1976). “21-4204, instead of K.S.A. 21-4202. The erroneous citation was repeated in the journal entry.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4202(a) — 1 case
State v. Roose, 203 P.3d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Roose was charged under K.S.A. 21-4202, which deals with aggravated weapons violations.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4202(a)(1) — 1 case
State v. Roose, 203 P.3d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Roose was charged under K.S.A. 21-4202, which deals with aggravated weapons violations.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4202(a)(2) — 1 case
State v. Roose, 203 P.3d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Roose was charged under K.S.A. 21-4202, which deals with aggravated weapons violations.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4202(a)(4)(A) — 1 case
State v. LaGrange, 279 P.3d 105 (Kan. 2012). “We arrive at the same conclusion as the Court of Appeals majority with respect to the meaning of the released from prison phrase in K.S.A. 21-4202(a)(4)(A), i.e., “such felony” identifies both the listed Kansas felonies and the substantially similar out-of-state felonies.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4202(a)(l) — 1 case
State v. Roose, 203 P.3d 18 (Kan. Ct. App. 2009). “Roose was charged under K.S.A. 21-4202, which deals with aggravated weapons violations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.