K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-424 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-424.

History: G.S. 1868, ch. 31, § 31; L. 1887, ch. 150, § 1; R.S. 1923, 21-424; L. 1929, ch. 172, § 1; Repealed, L. 1969, ch. 180, § 21-4701; July 1, 1970.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1964–1983 · leading case: State v. Coberly, 661 P.2d 383 (Kan. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Coberly, 661 P.2d 383 (Kan. 1983). “” This statute replaced the previous offense of statutory rape in K.S.A. 21-424 (Corrick). The defendant was charged with committing the crime of indecent liberties with a child by having sexual intercourse with Ms.”
State v. Fleury, 457 P.2d 44 (Kan. 1969). “21-1617) and of forcible rape (K.S.A. 21-424). He was tried and found not guilty of first degree kidnapping.”
State v. Kennelly, 485 P.2d 179 (Kan. 1971). · cites it 2× ““In Count II of the Information, you are charged with the offense of forcible rape in violation of Section 21-424, Kansas Statutes Annotated.”
State v. Burnett, 397 P.2d 346 (Kan. 1964). · cites it 2× “4133, both cases having been heard by this Court in Bourbon County, Kansas, and the Court being fully advised in the premises finds that the said defendant, Melvin Burnett, is guilty of kidnapping in the first degree under Section 21-449, 1961 Supplement to the General Statutes…”
State v. Kinnell, 419 P.2d 870 (Kan. 1966). · cites it 2× “4133, both cases having been heard by this Court in Bourbon County, Kansas, and the Court being fully advised in the premises finds that the said defendant, Dale Kmnell, is guilty of kidnapping in the first degree under Section 21-449, 1991 Supplement to the General Statutes of…”
Sharp v. State, 457 P.2d 14 (Kan. 1969). “21-449) and on the forcible rape charge to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than 5 years nor more than 21 years (K.S.A. 21-424), the sentences to run concurrently.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.