K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-4620 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-4620.

History: L. 1980, ch. 104, § 4; L. 1988, ch. 115, § 5; L. 1990, ch. 309, § 15; L. 1991, ch. 260, § 5; L. 1992, ch. 239, § 248; Repealed, L. 2010, ch. 136, § 307; July 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1981–2001 · leading case: State v. Jones, 35 P.3d 887 (Kan. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jones, 35 P.3d 887 (Kan. 2001). · cites it 3× ““(b) If defendant is sentenced to the custody of the secretaiy of corrections the journal entry shall record all the information required under K.S.A. 21-4620 to be included in a judgment form, if it were used.”
State v. Thomas, 720 P.2d 1059 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 2× “22-3504 to correct his sentences to reflect, under K.S.A. 21-4620(a)(2)(C), that he was merely an aider and abettor in the crimes.”
Cansler v. State, 675 P.2d 57 (Kan. 1984). “21-4603, defining the authorized dispositions a court may make after a criminal conviction, including committing the defendant to the custody of the secretary of corrections; K.S.A. 21-4620, which authorizes the sentencing of defendants to the custody of the secretary of…”
State v. Wilson, 634 P.2d 1078 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 21-4620(b). The essence of the second prong of defendant’s attack upon the sentences imposed is that under the evidence presented, it was improper to sentence him as a third offender.”
State v. Fowler, 710 P.2d 1268 (Kan. 1985). “K.S.A. 21-4620 requires that the journal entry or judg *336 ment form contain a statement of the effective date of the sentence indicating whether it is the date of imposition or some date earlier “to give credit for time confined pending disposition of the case pursuant to K.”
State v. Bennett, 731 P.2d 284 (Kan. 1987). “K.S.A. 21-4620(b)(3). Upon receipt of the report of the Kansas State Reception and Diagnostic Center, the Secretary of Corrections selects one of the state correctional institutions for the defendant’s confinement based upon the examinations and studies made of the defendant.”
State v. Littlejohn, 925 P.2d 839 (Kan. 1996). “In this case, Littlejohn requested that the journal entry of his convictions be altered to indicate, in accordance with K.S.A. 21-4620(a)(2)(C), that he had only been convicted as an aider or abettor, not as a principal, in the 1981 case.”
State v. Walters, 655 P.2d 947 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “The 1980 legislature deleted that requirement from 21-4603(3), but makes the same requirement in K.S.A. 21-4620(a)(2)(C). Thus, the trial court should have noted in its journal entry of judgment that the *244 defendant was convicted by reason of aiding, abetting, advising or…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4620(a)(2)(C) — 3 cases
State v. Thomas, 720 P.2d 1059 (Kan. 1986). “22-3504 to correct his sentences to reflect, under K.S.A. 21-4620(a)(2)(C), that he was merely an aider and abettor in the crimes.”
State v. Littlejohn, 925 P.2d 839 (Kan. 1996). “In this case, Littlejohn requested that the journal entry of his convictions be altered to indicate, in accordance with K.S.A. 21-4620(a)(2)(C), that he had only been convicted as an aider or abettor, not as a principal, in the 1981 case.”
State v. Walters, 655 P.2d 947 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “The 1980 legislature deleted that requirement from 21-4603(3), but makes the same requirement in K.S.A. 21-4620(a)(2)(C). Thus, the trial court should have noted in its journal entry of judgment that the *244 defendant was convicted by reason of aiding, abetting, advising or…”
— K.S.A. § 21-4620(b) — 1 case
State v. Wilson, 634 P.2d 1078 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981). “K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 21-4620(b). The essence of the second prong of defendant’s attack upon the sentences imposed is that under the evidence presented, it was improper to sentence him as a third offender.”
— K.S.A. § 21-4620(b)(3) — 1 case
State v. Bennett, 731 P.2d 284 (Kan. 1987). “K.S.A. 21-4620(b)(3). Upon receipt of the report of the Kansas State Reception and Diagnostic Center, the Secretary of Corrections selects one of the state correctional institutions for the defendant’s confinement based upon the examinations and studies made of the defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.