K.S.A. » Chapter 21
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 21-6607 (2026)

Conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to community correctional services program; correctional supervision fee; correctional supervision fund; searches; written reports

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

21-6607. Conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to community correctional services program; correctional supervision fee; correctional supervision fund; searches; written reports. (a) Except as required by subsection (c), nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the court to impose or modify any general or specific conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program. The court services officer or community correctional services officer may recommend, and the court may order, the imposition of any conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program. For crimes committed on or after July 1, 1993, in presumptive nonprison cases, the court services officer or community correctional services officer may recommend, and the court may order, the imposition of any conditions of probation or assignment to a community correctional services program. The court may at any time order the modification of such conditions, after notice to the court services officer or community correctional services officer and an opportunity for such officer to be heard thereon. The court shall cause a copy of any such order to be delivered to the court services officer and the probationer or to the community correctional services officer and the community corrections participant, as the case may be. The provisions of K.S.A. 75-5291, and amendments thereto, shall be applicable to any assignment to a community correctional services program pursuant to this section.

(b) The court may impose any conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program that the court deems proper, including, but not limited to, requiring that the defendant:

(1) Obey all laws and ordinances and report any law enforcement contact to the defendant's supervision officer within 24 hours after such contact;

(2) not engage in physical violence or threats of violence of any kind and, if the defendant is being supervised for conviction of a felony, not purchase or possess a dangerous weapon, including a firearm, while on supervision;

(3) report to the defendant's supervision officer as directed and be truthful in all matters;

(4) remain within the state of Kansas or other specified areas as defined by the defendant's supervision officer;

(5) reside at the defendant's approved residence unless the defendant receives permission from the defendant's supervision officer to relocate and notify the defendant's supervision officer within 24 hours after any emergency changes in residence or contact information;

(6) not possess, use or distribute any controlled substances except those prescribed by a licensed medical professional;

(7) not possess or consume any form of alcohol or intoxicating substance or enter any establishment where alcohol is sold or consumed as the primary business;

(8) submit to any form of alcohol or substance use testing directed by the defendant's supervision officer and not alter or tamper with the specimen or test;

(9) participate in assessment, treatment, programming and other directives of the court or the defendant's supervision officer;

(10) be subject to searches of the defendant's person, effects, vehicle, residence and property by a court services officer, community correctional services officer or any other law enforcement officer based on reasonable suspicion that the defendant violated conditions of probation or engaged in criminal activity; or

(11) refrain from contacting victims unless authorized by the court to contact a victim as part of rehabilitative or therapeutic purposes.

(c) In addition to any conditions of probation, suspension of sentence or assignment to a community correctional services program ordered pursuant to subsection (b), the court shall order the defendant to:

(1) Make reparation or restitution to the aggrieved party for the damage or loss caused by the defendant's crime in accordance with K.S.A. 21-6604(b), and amendments thereto;

(2) (A) pay a correctional supervision fee of $60 if the person was convicted of a misdemeanor or a fee of $120 if the person was convicted of a felony. In any case the amount of the correctional supervision fee specified by this paragraph may be reduced or waived by the judge if the person is unable to pay that amount;

(B) the correctional supervision fee imposed by this paragraph shall be charged and collected by the district court. The clerk of the district court shall remit all revenues received under this paragraph from correctional supervision fees to the state treasurer in accordance with the provisions of K.S.A. 75-4215, and amendments thereto. Upon receipt of each such remittance, the state treasurer shall deposit the entire amount in the state treasury to the credit of the state general fund, a sum equal to 41.67% of such remittance, and to the correctional supervision fund, a sum equal to 58.33% of such remittance;

(C) this paragraph shall apply to persons placed on felony or misdemeanor probation or released on misdemeanor parole to reside in Kansas and supervised by Kansas court services officers under the interstate compact for offender supervision; and

(D) this paragraph shall not apply to persons placed on probation or released on parole to reside in Kansas under the uniform act for out-of-state parolee supervision; and

(3) reimburse the state general fund for all or a part of the expenditures by the state board of indigents' defense services to provide counsel and other defense services to the defendant. In determining the amount and method of payment of such sum, the court shall take account of the financial resources of the defendant and the nature of the burden that payment of such sum will impose. A defendant who has been required to pay such sum and who is not willfully in default in the payment thereof may at any time petition the court which sentenced the defendant to waive payment of such sum or of any unpaid portion thereof. If it appears to the satisfaction of the court that payment of the amount due will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or the defendant's immediate family, the court may waive payment of all or part of the amount due or modify the method of payment. The amount of attorney fees to be included in the court order for reimbursement shall be the amount claimed by appointed counsel on the payment voucher for indigents' defense services or the amount prescribed by the board of indigents' defense services reimbursement tables as provided in K.S.A. 22-4522, and amendments thereto, whichever is less.

(d) The office of judicial administration and the department of corrections shall collaborate to develop documentation related to conditions of supervision.

(e) Any law enforcement officer who conducts a search pursuant to subsection (b)(10) shall submit a written report to the appropriate court services officer or community correctional services officer not later than the close of business the next day after such search is conducted. The written report shall include the facts leading to such search, the scope of such search and any findings resulting from such search.

(f) There is hereby established in the state treasury the correctional supervision fund. All moneys credited to the correctional supervision fund shall be used for: (1) The implementation of and training for use of a statewide, mandatory, standardized risk assessment tool or instrument as specified by the Kansas sentencing commission, pursuant to K.S.A. 75-5291, and amendments thereto; (2) the implementation of and training for use of a statewide, mandatory, standardized risk assessment tool or instrument for juveniles adjudicated to be juvenile offenders; and (3) evidence-based adult and juvenile offender supervision programs by judicial branch personnel. If all expenditures for the program have been paid and moneys remain in the correctional supervision fund for a fiscal year, remaining moneys may be expended from the correctional supervision fund to support adult and juvenile offender supervision by court services officers. All expenditures from the correctional supervision fund shall be made in accordance with appropriation acts upon warrants of the director of accounts and reports issued pursuant to vouchers approved by the chief justice of the Kansas supreme court or by a person or persons designated by the chief justice.

History: L. 2010, ch. 136, § 247; L. 2011, ch. 30, § 64; L. 2012, ch. 70, § 1; L. 2014, ch. 126, § 4; L. 2020, ch. 9, § 2; L. 2024, ch. 96, § 6; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 48 cases (25 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: State v. Arnett, 413 P.3d 787 (Kan. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Arnett, 413 P.3d 787 (Kan. 2018). · cites it 3× “Does K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-6607(c) support the restitution order? The State argues that the Court of Appeals misinterpreted the restitution statute when it concluded that **653 K.”
State v. Robison, 469 P.3d 83 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 16× “K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-6604(b)(1) grants a district court the authority to order a convicted defendant to pay restitution as part of the sentence.”
State v. Hinnenkamp, 446 P.3d 1103 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 35× “As the Nwoji and Tran panel noted, in 2012, the Kansas Legislature amended *1113 K.S.A. 21-6607 to allow suspicionless drug and alcohol testing of probationers.”
State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 4× “" In the same way, K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-6607(c)(2) gives the district court the authority to order restitution payments as a condition of probation.”
State v. Robison, 496 P.3d 892 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 3× “" In the same way, K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-6607(c)(2) gives the district court the authority to order restitution payments as a condition of probation.”
State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016). “K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-6607(b), (c). "In sum, I do not believe the federal courts, more specifically the United States Supreme Court, would hold that this historical-form-of-punishment factor weighs toward an ex post facto violation.”
Shaw v. Patton, 823 F.3d 556 (10th Cir. 2016). “, concurring in part and dissenting in part) (quoting Kan. Stat. Ann. § 21-6607 (b), (c)). Noting that Kansas’s sex-offender statute required registration but none of the other features of probation, the court rejected the challenger's analogy to probation.”
State v. Owens, 496 P.3d 902 (Kan. 2021). “See K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-6604(b)(1); K.S.A. 2016 Supp.”
State v. Collins, 362 P.3d 1098 (Kan. 2015). “2d 15 (1991); see also K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-6607(b) (court may impose any probation conditions it deems proper).”
State v. Holley, 509 P.3d 542 (Kan. 2022). “21-6604(b)—or as a condition of probation—as contemplated by K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 21-6607(c)(2). "However, a criminal defendant will not be faced with a civil judgment for restitution unless it has been obtained separately through a civil cause of action.”
State v. Martin, 429 P.3d 896 (Kan. 2018). “" (Emphasis added.) Consequently, when the defense raises a legitimate issue as to whether the restitution damages claimed by the victims were caused by the defendant's crime of conviction, the district court must resolve that dispute by conducting a restitution hearing.”
State v. Hambright, 388 P.3d 613 (Kan. Ct. App. 2017). “K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 21-6607(c)(2) states that a “court shall order the defendant to .”
Show all 48 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(a) — 2 cases
State v. Hayes (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).
State v. Stone (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(b) — 7 cases
State v. Petersen-Beard, 377 P.3d 1127 (Kan. 2016). “K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-6607(b), (c). "In sum, I do not believe the federal courts, more specifically the United States Supreme Court, would hold that this historical-form-of-punishment factor weighs toward an ex post facto violation.”
State v. Collins, 362 P.3d 1098 (Kan. 2015). “2d 15 (1991); see also K.S.A. 2011 Supp. 21-6607(b) (court may impose any probation conditions it deems proper).”
Doe v. Thompson, 373 P.3d 750 (Kan. 2016).
State v. Jones, 430 P.3d 488 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Mason (Kan. Ct. App. 2021).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(b)(5) — 1 case
State v. Jones, 430 P.3d 488 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(c) — 4 cases
State v. Arnett, 413 P.3d 787 (Kan. 2018). “Does K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-6607(c) support the restitution order? The State argues that the Court of Appeals misinterpreted the restitution statute when it concluded that **653 K.”
State v. Hinnenkamp, 446 P.3d 1103 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). “As the Nwoji and Tran panel noted, in 2012, the Kansas Legislature amended *1113 K.S.A. 21-6607 to allow suspicionless drug and alcohol testing of probationers.”
State v. Futrell, 387 P.3d 176 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Raymundo-Lopez (Kan. Ct. App. 2026).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(c)(1) — 1 case
State v. Zarinegar (Kan. Ct. App. 2026).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(c)(2) — 28 cases
State v. Robison, 469 P.3d 83 (Kan. Ct. App. 2020). “K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-6604(b)(1) grants a district court the authority to order a convicted defendant to pay restitution as part of the sentence.”
State v. Arnett, 496 P.3d 928 (Kan. 2021). “" In the same way, K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-6607(c)(2) gives the district court the authority to order restitution payments as a condition of probation.”
State v. Robison, 496 P.3d 892 (Kan. 2021). “" In the same way, K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 21-6607(c)(2) gives the district court the authority to order restitution payments as a condition of probation.”
State v. Arnett, 413 P.3d 787 (Kan. 2018). “Does K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-6607(c) support the restitution order? The State argues that the Court of Appeals misinterpreted the restitution statute when it concluded that **653 K.”
State v. Owens, 496 P.3d 902 (Kan. 2021). “See K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 21-6604(b)(1); K.S.A. 2016 Supp.”
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(c)(3)(A) — 1 case
State v. Caldwell (Kan. Ct. App. 2022).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(c)(5) — 4 cases
State v. Toliver, 368 P.3d 1117 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Hinnenkamp, 446 P.3d 1103 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). “As the Nwoji and Tran panel noted, in 2012, the Kansas Legislature amended *1113 K.S.A. 21-6607 to allow suspicionless drug and alcohol testing of probationers.”
State v. Toliver (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Brown (Kan. Ct. App. 2020).
— K.S.A. § 21-6607(c)(6) — 1 case
State v. Hinnenkamp, 446 P.3d 1103 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). “As the Nwoji and Tran panel noted, in 2012, the Kansas Legislature amended *1113 K.S.A. 21-6607 to allow suspicionless drug and alcohol testing of probationers.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.