Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 22-3417 (2026)
Objections to rulings
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
22-3417. Objections to rulings. Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary. It is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take or his objection to the action of the court and his grounds therefor; and, if a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice him.
History: L. 1970, ch. 129, § 22-3417; July 1.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: State v. Gonzalez, 412 P.3d 968 (Kan. 2018).
State v. Gonzalez, 412 P.3d 968 (Kan. 2018). “3d 292 (2013) (Herbel and his counsel's lack of awareness of ex parte communication means failure to seek posttrial remedies cannot be held against him); see also K.S.A. 22-3417 ("[I]f a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence…”
State v. Herbel, 299 P.3d 292 (Kan. 2013). “, K.S.A. 22-3417 (“[I]f a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice him.”
State v. Miles, 662 P.2d 1227 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 22-3417 provides: “Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the court are unnecessary.”
State v. Sanders, 578 P.2d 702 (Kan. 1978). “K.S.A. 22-3417 reads in part as follows: “.”
State v. Ward (Kan. Ct. App. 2025). “" K.S.A. 22-3417. But Ward simply asking the court if he receives jail credit in case 22-CR-1130 does not make it known to the court that he wants jail credit.”
State v. Gatewood (Kan. 2026). “See K.S.A. 22-3417 ("[I]f a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.