Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 22-4706 (2026)

Agreements between central repository and criminal justice agencies

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

22-4706. Agreements between central repository and criminal justice agencies. The director, pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted, shall develop agreements between the central repository and criminal justice agencies pertaining to:

(a) The method by which the agency will report information, including the method of identifying an offender in a manner that permits other criminal justice agencies to locate the offender at any stage in the criminal justice system, the time of reporting, the specific data to be reported by the agency, and the place of reporting;

(b) the services to be provided to the agency by the central repository;

(c) the conditions and limitations upon the dissemination of criminal history record information by the agency;

(d) the maintenance of security in all transactions between the central repository and the agency;

(e) the method of complying with the right of a person to inspect, challenge, and correct criminal history record information maintained by the agency;

(f) audit requirements to ensure the accuracy of all information reported or disseminated;

(g) the timetable for the implementation of the agreement;

(h) sanctions for failure of the agency to comply with any of the provisions of this act, including the revocation of any agreement between the agency and the central repository and appropriate judicial or administrative proceedings to enforce compliance; and

(i) other provisions that the director may deem necessary.

History: L. 1978, ch. 118, § 6; March 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Use of defendant's prior arrests were sufficiently connected with case under investigation to support probable cause to issue search warrant. State v. Ruff, 266 Kan. 27, 38, 967 P.2d 742 (1998).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1998–1998 · leading case: State v. Ruff, 967 P.2d 742 (Kan. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ruff, 967 P.2d 742 (Kan. 1998). “The data sent to the KBI and collected in a central repository is maintained as “[c]riminal history record information.”
K.S.A. § 22-4706(b): 1 case
State v. Ruff, 967 P.2d 742 (Kan. 1998). “The data sent to the KBI and collected in a central repository is maintained as “[c]riminal history record information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.