History:
L. 1974, ch. 166, § 1; Repealed, L. 1981, ch. 171, § 51; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. This and following sections analyzed; intentional failure of candidate to remit contributions to treasurer did not constitute fraudulent campaign finance reporting. State v. Doyen, 224 Kan. 482, 484, 580 P.2d 1351.
2. Whether administrative complaint filed under act was fatally defective presents no federal question; will not be considered. Parcell v. State of Kansas, 468 F. Supp. 1274, 1275, 1282.
3. Governmental ethics commission, the majority of which is appointed by legislators, does not constitute a usurpation of executive power by legislature and does not violate doctrine of separation of powers. Parcell v. State, 228 Kan. 794, 620 P.2d 834.
4. Campaign finance act held unconstitutional because enacting clause defective. State v. Kearns, 229 Kan. 207, 623 P.2d 507.
State v. Doyen, 580 P.2d 1351 (Kan. 1978). “In order to determine the issue raised on the appeal, we must carefully analyze those provisions of the Campaign Finance Act (K.S.A. 1977 Supp. 25-4101, et seq.) which are pertinent in this case.”
Nichols v. Kansas Political Action Comm., 11 P.3d 1134 (Kan. 2000). “That statute is part of the Campaign Finance Act, K.S.A. 25-4101 et seq. There *47 is nothing in the Campaign Finance Act which provides for the cause of action against one who violates the provisions of the statement of fair campaign practices.”
Parcell v. State of Kan., 468 F. Supp. 1274 (D. Kan. 1979). “K.S.A. 25-4101 to 4141. Parcell alleges this court has jurisdiction over the claims under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.”
State v. Kearns, 623 P.2d 507 (Kan. 1981). “Appellee then filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds the Campaign Finance Act (K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 25-4101 et seq.) is unconstitutional because its enacting clause does not comply with Article 2, § 20 of the Kansas Constitution.”
Parcell v. State, 620 P.2d 834 (Kan. 1980). “Parcell had violated the Campaign Finance Act (K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 25-4101 et seq.) by failing to prepare and file reports with the secretary of state relative to her expenditures in a Wyandotte County election to secure the defeat of Associate District Judge Francis J.”
Doris E. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Comm'n, State of Kansas, & Leonard Thomas, 626 F.2d 160 (10th Cir. 1980). “The Commission so constituted is charged with a variety of powers and duties pertaining to the administration and enforcement of the Kansas Campaign Finance Act, K.S.A. 25-4101 et seq. The particular question which has been presented, among others, to this court, and which we…”
Doris E. Parcell v. Governmental Ethics Comm'n, State of Kansas, & Leonard Thomas, 639 F.2d 628 (10th Cir. 1980). “Parcell had violated the Campaign Finance Act (K.S.A.1979 Supp. 25-4101 et seq.) by failing to prepare and file reports with the secretary of state relative to her expenditures in a Wyandotte County election to secure the defeat of Associate District Judge Francis J.”
Gietzen v. Feleciano, Jr., 964 P.2d 699 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “That statute is part of the Campaign Finance Act, K.S.A. 25-4101 et seq. There is nothing in the Campaign Finance Act which provides for the cause of action against one who violates the provisions of the statement of fair campaign practices.”
Parcell v. Kansas, 639 F.2d 630 (10th Cir. 1980). “Parcell had violated the Campaign Finance Act (K.S.A.1979 Supp. 25-4101 et seq.) by failing to prepare and file reports with the secretary of state relative to her expenditures in a Wyandotte County election to secure the defeat of Associate District Judge Francis J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.