K.S.A. » Chapter 26
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 26-101 (2026)

Condemnation by corporations and partnerships

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

26-101. Condemnation by corporations and partnerships. Any corporation having the right of eminent domain and any partnership holding a certificate of convenience issued by the state corporation commission and having the right of eminent domain, shall exercise such right in the manner set forth in K.S.A. 26-501 to 26-516, inclusive.

History: R.S. 1923, 26-101; L. 1935, ch. 179, § 1; L. 1947, ch. 183, § 2; L. 1949, ch. 258, § 1; L. 1963, ch. 234, § 70; January 1, 1964.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1969–2007 · leading case: Miller v. Glacier Dev. Co., LLC, 161 P.3d 730 (Kan. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Miller v. Glacier Dev. Co., LLC, 161 P.3d 730 (Kan. 2007). · cites it 2× “' K.S.A. 26-101. The major issue in a condemnation action is the condemned property's fair market value.”
Spears v. Kansas City Power & Light Co., 455 P.2d 496 (Kan. 1969). · cites it 4× “" Paragraph 4 of the same petition reads as follows: "Petitioner desires to exercise the right of eminent domain as conferred upon it by Section 17-618 of General Statutes of Kansas, 1949, in the manner provided by Section 26-101 of General Statutes of Kansas, 1949, for the…”
Butler Cnty. Rural Water Dist. No. 8 v. Yates, 64 P.3d 357 (Kan. 2003). “’ K.S.A. 26-101.” City of Wichita, Kansas v.”
City of Wichita v. Eisenring, 7 P.3d 1248 (Kan. 2000). “” K.S.A. 26-101. The major issue in a condemnation action is the condemned property’s fair market value.”
Condemnation of Land for State High. Purposes v. Stranger Valley Land Co., 123 P.3d 731 (Kan. 2005). “However, since the enactment of the eminent domain statutes into law, K.S.A. 26-101 et seq., to the recent legislative amendment of K.”
Landau Inv. Co. v. City of Overland Park, 930 P.2d 1065 (Kan. 1997). “Proceedings are initiated by the filing of a verified petition in the district court of the county in which the real estate is located.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.