Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 28-318 (2026)

Penalties for violation of 1911 act*

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

28-318. Penalties for violation of 1911 act*. Any officer, deputy, assistant or clerk mentioned in this act or whose salary or compensation is herein provided for or authorized, who shall ask or receive any fee or reward in money or its equivalent not authorized by this act or the laws of this state, or who shall fail to make out and file any report herein provided for, or who shall fail to pay to the county treasurer any fees or income collected by him in the time and manner prescribed by this act*, or who shall fail, neglect or refuse to perform any duty enjoined upon him by this act*, shall for each offense be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor and fined in any sum not exceeding three hundred dollars or confined in the county jail for not to exceed one year or shall receive a sentence of both such fine and imprisonment. And such failure to perform any of the duties prescribed by this act shall be a forfeiture of office and upon the judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action that such officer, deputy, assistant or clerk has forfeited such office, he shall stand suspended during any appeal therefrom. Except the fees of the county attorney in civil and criminal proceedings under the laws relating to intoxicating liquors and gambling and otherwise provided by law.

History: L. 1911, ch. 190, § 19; March 3; R.S. 1923, 28-318.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2016–2016 · leading case: State v. Boysaw, 372 P.3d 1261 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016).
State v. Boysaw, 372 P.3d 1261 (Kan. Ct. App. 2016). “§ 28-318 (5) (1985) defined “sexual contact” as: “[T]he intentional touching of the victims sexual or intimate parts or the intentional touching of the victim’s clothing covering the immediate area of the victim s sexual or intimate parts.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.