Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-141 (2026)

Parents' rights to exercise primary control over the upbringing of their children; cause of action

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-141. Parents' rights to exercise primary control over the upbringing of their children; cause of action. (a) As used in this section:

(1) "Child" means a person under 18 years of age; and

(2) "parent" means and includes a natural parent, an adoptive parent, a stepparent or a guardian or conservator of a child who is liable by law to maintain, care for or support the child.

(b) It shall be the public policy of this state that parents shall retain the fundamental right to exercise primary control over the care and upbringing of their children in their charge. It is further the public policy of this state that children shall have the right to protection from abuse and neglect.

(c) Nothing in subsection (b) shall be interpreted to expand, diminish or in any way alter the scope of the rights of parents or children to the extent such rights exist as of the effective date of this act.

(d) Any parent may maintain a cause of action in state court or in any court of competent jurisdiction for claims arising under the principles established in subsection (b). Any person authorized by law to act on behalf of a child may maintain a cause of action in the name of such child in any court of competent jurisdiction for claims arising under the principles established in subsection (b).

History: L. 1996, ch. 229, § 159; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: Roberts v. Kansas Sch. Bd. Ass'n, No. 2:21-cv-02492 (D. Kan. Jan. 11, 2022).
Roberts v. Kansas Sch. Bd. Ass'n, No. 2:21-cv-02492 (D. Kan. Jan. 11, 2022). · cites it 4× “In opposition, Roberts cites to K.S.A. 38-141 for the proposition that Kansas law allows her to represent her children in this action.”
Shophar v. City of Olathe, No. 17-3143 (10th Cir. Jan. 22, 2018). “§ 1029 (fraud in connection with access devices); and Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-141 (providing a civil cause of action in support of parental rights).”
State v. Ross, 568 P.3d 877 (Kan. Ct. App. 2025). “" K.S.A. 38-141(b). At the crossroads of these two rights lies the common-law parental privilege to use reasonable and appropriate physical force to correct one's child for the purpose of safeguarding or maintaining discipline.”
K.S.A. § 38-141(b): 2 cases
Roberts v. Kansas Sch. Bd. Ass'n, No. 2:21-cv-02492 (D. Kan. Jan. 11, 2022). “In opposition, Roberts cites to K.S.A. 38-141 for the proposition that Kansas law allows her to represent her children in this action.”
State v. Ross, 568 P.3d 877 (Kan. Ct. App. 2025). “" K.S.A. 38-141(b). At the crossroads of these two rights lies the common-law parental privilege to use reasonable and appropriate physical force to correct one's child for the purpose of safeguarding or maintaining discipline.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.