K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1532 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1532.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 28; L. 1998, ch. 187, § 17; L. 2000, ch. 150, § 8; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 200, § 120; January 1, 2007.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Censure of judge for failure to comply with provisions of statute noted. In re Long, 244 Kan. 719, 720, 772 P.2d 814 (1989).

2. Child in need of care proceedings discussed generally, with emphasis on roles of respective parties thereto. In re D.D.P., Jr., 249 Kan. 529, 532, 819 P.2d 1212 (1991).

3. "Parent" broadly construed to avoid undue limitation on state's power in parental rights termination case. In re A.N.P., 23 Kan. App. 2d 686, 689, 934 P.2d 995 (1997).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1989–2005 · leading case: In Re the Inquiry Relating to Long, 772 P.2d 814 (Kan. 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re the Inquiry Relating to Long, 772 P.2d 814 (Kan. 1989). · cites it 4× “38-1625 and K.S.A. 38-1532. K.S.A. 38-1532 of the Code for Care of Children provides in part: “Upon the filing of a petition under this code the court shall proceed by one of the following methods: “(a) Issue summons stating the place and time at which the parties are required…”
In Re Rose, 144 S.W.3d 661 (Tex. 2004). “Kan. Stat. Ann. § 38-1532 (2000). Likewise, when a complaint is filed under the Kansas Juvenile Justice Code, unless the respondent child is personally served at a detention hearing, “the court shall .”
In re S.M.H., 103 P.3d 976 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “The matter then proceeds according to a prescribed course of proceedings set out in K.S.A. 38-1532 et seq. However, K.S.A. 2003 Supp.”
In re D.D.P., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991). “*532 K.S.A. 38-1532 through -1536 set forth the service of process requirements.”
In re A.N.P., 934 P.2d 995 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “38-1531(b)(l)(B); would not receive summons notifying them of the action, K.S.A. 38-1532(a) and K.S.A. 38-1533(a); and would not be entitled to appointed counsel, K.”
In the Interest of C.B., 117 P.3d 888 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “See K.S.A. 38-1532; K.S.A. 38-1533(a); K.S.A.”
In Re Cb, 34 Kan. App. 2d 317 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “See K.S.A. 38-1532; K.S.A. 38-1533(a); K.S.A.”
In Re Smh, 103 P.3d 976 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “The matter then proceeds according to a prescribed course of proceedings set out in K.S.A. 38-1532 et seq. However, K.S.A. 2003 Supp.”
In Re Ddp, Jr., 819 P.2d 1212 (Kan. 1991). “*532 K.S.A. 38-1532 through -1536 set forth the service of process requirements.”
In Re Anp, 934 P.2d 995 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “38-1531(b)(1)(B); would not receive summons notifying them of the action, K.S.A. 38-1532(a) and K.S.A. 38-1533(a); and would not be entitled to appointed counsel, K.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1532(a) — 2 cases
In re A.N.P., 934 P.2d 995 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “38-1531(b)(l)(B); would not receive summons notifying them of the action, K.S.A. 38-1532(a) and K.S.A. 38-1533(a); and would not be entitled to appointed counsel, K.”
In Re Anp, 934 P.2d 995 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “38-1531(b)(1)(B); would not receive summons notifying them of the action, K.S.A. 38-1532(a) and K.S.A. 38-1533(a); and would not be entitled to appointed counsel, K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.