Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 38-1601 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
38-1601.
History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 59; L. 1996, ch. 229, § 2; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 60
cases, 1984–2015 · leading case: In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008). “Acknowledging that the Sixth Amendment applies only to criminal prosecutions, the Findlay court concluded that juvenile adjudications then were not criminal prosecutions based on K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 38-1601, which provided: “ ‘K.”
State v. Hitt, 42 P.3d 732 (Kan. 2002). “’ ” When LaMunyon was decided, K.S.A. 38-1601 (Furse 1993) made clear that no “order, judgment or decree of the district court, in any proceedings under the provisions of this code, [shall] be deemed or held to import a criminal act on the part of any juvenile.”
State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996). “Defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals, arguing that the Kansas Juvenile Offenders Code (the Code), K.S.A. 38-1601 etseq., prohibited juvenile adjudications from being used to calculate an offender’s criminal history under the KSGA.”
State v. Quested, 352 P.3d 553 (Kan. 2015). “3d 1 (2002), in which we declined to find any common-law power to order consecutive sentences in juvenile cases given that "[n]owhere in [the Kansas Juvenile Justice Code (KJJC), K.S.A. 38-1601 et seq.] did the legislature provide for consecutive sentencing.”
State v. Breedlove, 179 P.3d 1115 (Kan. 2008). “Breedlove further demands that we affirm his convictions, but vacate his sentences and remand for resentencing under the Kansas Juvenile Offenders Code, K.S.A. 38-1601 et seq. (Furse 1993). He is currently 30 years old.”
In Re Mary P., 701 P.2d 681 (Kan. 1985). “: This is an appeal from the order of the district court of Johnson County in a proceeding under the Kansas juvenile offenders code, K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 38-1601 et seq. The court held that the appellant was a juvenile offender, K.”
Findlay v. State, 681 P.2d 20 (Kan. 1984). “Findlay appeals his juvenile offender adjudication under the Kansas Juvenile Offenders Code (K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 38-1601 et seq.). For his first issue, appellant contends the district court erred in refusing to grant him a jury trial as a matter of constitutional right.”
State v. Ellmaker, 221 P.3d 1105 (Kan. 2009). “21-3401(a); K.S.A. 21-3414. Based in part on the severity of these crimes, the State filed a motion requesting a “waiver to adult status” under K.”
Foster v. Kansas Dep't of Revenue, 130 P.3d 560 (Kan. 2006). “While the clear purpose of 38-1683(a) is to provide a prompt review of the district magistrate judge’s decision, order and promptness are the general characteristics of a directory statute.”
State v. Muhammad, 703 P.2d 835 (Kan. 1985). “Muhammad, following her conviction by a jury of one count of conspiracy to commit felony theft and one count of felony theft, appeals from the decision and order of the district court waiving jurisdiction under the Kansas juvenile offenders code (K.S.A. 1984 Supp. 38-1601 et…”
State v. Mayfield, 738 P.2d 861 (Kan. 1987). “The Kansas juvenile' code has now been supplanted by the Kansas juvenile offenders code (K.S.A. 38-1601 et seq.). K.S.A. 1977 Supp.”
State v. Valdez, 977 P.2d 242 (Kan. 1999). “Was it error for the trial court to allow the testimony of witnesses for the certification determination who had not been previously endorsed on the complaint as witnesses? An action under the Kansas Juvenile Offenders Code, K.S.A. 38-1601 et seq., is commenced by the filing of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.