K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1610 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1610.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 68; L. 1983, ch. 140, § 31; L. 1986, ch. 129, § 2; L. 1989, ch. 96, § 2; L. 1992, ch. 312, § 14; L. 1996, ch. 229, § 50; L. 1997, ch. 156, § 49; L. 1998, ch. 131, § 7; L. 2005, ch. 168, § 3; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1996–1999 · leading case: State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996). “K.S.A. 38-1610(e) states: “Upon entry of an order.”
State v. Lanning, 925 P.2d 1145 (Kan. 1996). “21-4606b (determination of presumptive assignment to community corrections), and K.S.A. 38-1610(e) (permitting use of expunged juvenile records in sentencing of subsequent juvenile dispositions and adult criminal convictions).”
In re A.C.W., 988 P.2d 742 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1610(b), dealing with expungement of records, specifically mentions K.”
In Re Acw, 988 P.2d 742 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1610(b), dealing with expungement of records, specifically mentions K.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1610(b) — 2 cases
In re A.C.W., 988 P.2d 742 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1610(b), dealing with expungement of records, specifically mentions K.”
In Re Acw, 988 P.2d 742 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “K.S.A. 1998 Supp. 38-1610(b), dealing with expungement of records, specifically mentions K.”
— K.S.A. § 38-1610(e) — 2 cases
State v. LaMunyon, 911 P.2d 151 (Kan. 1996). “K.S.A. 38-1610(e) states: “Upon entry of an order.”
State v. Lanning, 925 P.2d 1145 (Kan. 1996). “21-4606b (determination of presumptive assignment to community corrections), and K.S.A. 38-1610(e) (permitting use of expunged juvenile records in sentencing of subsequent juvenile dispositions and adult criminal convictions).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.