K.S.A. » Chapter 38
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 38-1652 (2026)

Repealed

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

38-1652.

History: L. 1982, ch. 182, § 95; L. 1993, ch. 166, § 5; L. 1995, ch. 243, § 1; L. 1996, ch. 229, § 73; L. 1997, ch. 156, § 60; Repealed, L. 2006, ch. 169, § 140; January 1, 2007.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1990–2008 · leading case: In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 38-1652. However, under the KJJC, the official file must be open to the public unless a judge orders it to be closed for juveniles under the age of 14 based on finding that it is in the best interests of the juvenile.”
Stauffer Commc'ns, Inc. v. Mitchell, 789 P.2d 1153 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 8× “Judge Mitchell informed Ryan that, unlike adjudicatory hearings conducted pursuant to K.S.A. 38-1652, there was no statutory basis for allowing the public to attend detention hearings.”
In re LM, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008). · cites it 2× “K.S.A.1982 Supp. 38-1652. However, under the KJJC, the official file must be open to the public unless a judge orders it to be closed for juveniles under the age of 14 based on finding that it is in the best interests of the juvenile.”
K.S.A. § 38-1652(a): 2 cases
In re L.M., 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008). “K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 38-1652. However, under the KJJC, the official file must be open to the public unless a judge orders it to be closed for juveniles under the age of 14 based on finding that it is in the best interests of the juvenile.”
In re LM, 186 P.3d 164 (Kan. 2008). “K.S.A.1982 Supp. 38-1652. However, under the KJJC, the official file must be open to the public unless a judge orders it to be closed for juveniles under the age of 14 based on finding that it is in the best interests of the juvenile.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.