History:
L. 1941, ch. 259, § 11; L. 1972, ch. 187, § 1; L. 1975, ch. 245, § 2; L. 1980, ch. 137, § 7; Repealed, L. 1997, ch. 8, § 15; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Cited in considering and applying statutory duties and authority of commissioner of insurance under act. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Bell, 227 Kan. 426, 435, 607 P.2d 498.
2. Mentioned in upholding provision in Blue Cross insurance service contracts rendering benefits personal and nonassignable. Augusta Medical Complex, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Kansas, Inc., 230 Kan. 361, 365, 634 P.2d 1123 (1981).
3. Cited; allegations of antitrust violations against provider's threatened termination of contracting provider agreement with hospital examined. Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., 635 F. Supp. 1287, 1335 (1986).
Augusta Med. Complex, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Kansas, Inc., 634 P.2d 1123 (Kan. 1981). “” K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 40-1811(c) provides: “(c) Each such corporation shall devote a reasonable effort to control costs, including both its administrative costs and costs charged to it by participating hospitals.”
Blue Cross of Kansas, Inc. v. Bell, 607 P.2d 498 (Kan. 1980). “K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 40-1811 and 40-1911 of the nonprofit hospital and medical service acts provide for maximum percentages of subscriber’s payments which may be paid during one year for administrative expenses.”
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., 635 F. Supp. 1287 (D. Kan. 1986). “through a combination of education, persuasion and financial incentives and disincentives to control costs and to encourage participating hospitals to control costs____” The court concluded: [T]he provision in the subscribers’ contracts rendering benefits personal and…”
— K.S.A. § 40-1811(c) — 2 cases
Augusta Med. Complex, Inc. v. Blue Cross of Kansas, Inc., 634 P.2d 1123 (Kan. 1981). “” K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 40-1811(c) provides: “(c) Each such corporation shall devote a reasonable effort to control costs, including both its administrative costs and costs charged to it by participating hospitals.”
Reazin v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc., 635 F. Supp. 1287 (D. Kan. 1986). “through a combination of education, persuasion and financial incentives and disincentives to control costs and to encourage participating hospitals to control costs____” The court concluded: [T]he provision in the subscribers’ contracts rendering benefits personal and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.