K.S.A. § 43-102 (2026)
Repealed
43-102.
History: G.S. 1868, ch. 54, § 2; L. 1876, ch. 104, § 2; R.S. 1923, 43-102; Repealed, L. 1971, ch. 176, § 22; July 1.
CASE ANNOTATIONS
1. Nonresident on jury vitiates verdict. Graham v. Trimmer, 61 Kan. 230, 236.
2. Irregularities in drawing not good ground for challenging array. The State v. Jenkins, 32 Kan. 477, 478, 4 P. 809; A.T.& S.F. Rld. Co. v. Davis, 34 Kan. 199, 203, 8 P. 146.
3. Challenge to array waived unless made before challenge for favor. The State v. Wright, 45 Kan. 136, 25 P. 631.
4. Payment of tax on personal property not test of competency. The State v. Reed, 53 Kan. 767, 772, 37 P. 174.
5. Empty jury box not sufficient showing to warrant summons to talesmen. The State v. Edwards, 64 Kan. 455, 459, 67 P. 834.
6. Assessment rolls has reference to both personal and real property. The State v. Gereke, 74 Kan. 196, 198, 86 P. 160, 87 P. 759.
7. Procedure reviewed; informalities and irregularities not enough to require panel be quashed. State v. Carter, 133 Kan. 718, 719, 3 P.2d 487.
8. Irregularity not shown, objection to panel or venire not considered. State v. Ryan, 141 Kan. 549, 551, 42 P.2d 591.
9. County clerk's affidavit held insufficient to show juror not taxpayer. Gollier v. City of Paola, 142 Kan. 282, 283, 46 P.2d 605.
10. Nonresident on jury; objection must be made before verdict; conviction upheld. State v. McCombs, 163 Kan. 225, 227, 181 P.2d 473.
11. Fact jurors erroneously selected from assessment rolls of current year mentioned. State v. Neff, 169 Kan. 116, 132, 218 P.2d 248.
12. Contention of purposeful exclusions from jury panel not sustained. Woods v. Munns, 347 F.2d 948, 949, 950.
13. Accused may not successfully challenge jury panel on any ground which does not involve corruption, serious misconduct or palpable disregard of the law. State v. Stanphill, 206 Kan. 612, 618, 619, 481 P.2d 998.
14. Section mentioned; defendant's objection that jury selection hereunder systematically excluded an economic class overruled. State v. Roth, 207 Kan. 691, 692, 693, 486 P.2d 1385.
15. United States Supreme Court decision concerning essential components in jury selection not applied retroactively; relief denied where jury impaneled hereunder. Roth v. State, 218 Kan. 413, 414, 543 P.2d 931.