K.S.A. » Chapter 45
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 45-219 (2026)

Copies of public records; fees and costs for inspection or copies; remittance of fees and costs by agency

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

45-219. Copies of public records; fees and costs for inspection or copies; remittance of fees and costs by agency. (a) Any person may make abstracts or obtain copies of any public record to which such person has access under this act. If copies are requested, the public agency may require a written request and advance payment of the prescribed fee. A public agency shall not be required to provide copies of radio or recording tapes or discs, video tapes or films, pictures, slides, graphics, illustrations or similar audio or visual items or devices, unless such items or devices were shown or played to a public meeting of the governing body thereof, except that the public agency shall not be required to provide such items or devices that are copyrighted by a person other than the public agency.

(b) Copies of public records shall be made while the records are in the possession, custody and control of the custodian or a person designated by the custodian and shall be made under the supervision of such custodian or person. Whenever practicable, copies shall be made in the place where the records are kept. If it is not practicable to do so, the custodian shall allow arrangements to be made for use of other facilities. If it is necessary to use other facilities for copying, the cost thereof shall be paid by the person desiring a copy of the records. In addition, the public agency may charge the same fee for the services rendered in supervising the copying as for furnishing copies under subsection (c) and may establish a reasonable schedule of times for making copies at other facilities.

(c) Except as provided by subsection (h) or where fees for inspection or for copies of a public record are prescribed by statute, each public agency may prescribe reasonable fees for providing access to or furnishing copies of public records, subject to the following:

(1) In the case of fees for copies of records, the fees shall not exceed the actual cost of furnishing the requested records, including the cost of staff time required to make the information available. Actual costs may include the cost to review and redact the requested records but shall not include incidental costs incurred by the public agency that are not attributable to furnishing the requested records.

(2) In the case of fees for providing access to records maintained on computer facilities, the fees shall include only the cost of any computer services, including staff time required.

(3) If the public agency incurs costs for staff time to provide access to or furnish copies of public records, the agency shall use in good faith the lowest-cost category of staff reasonably necessary to provide access to or furnish copies of public records. Charges for staff time shall be based on the employee's salary or hourly wage. Charges for staff time shall not include the costs of employee benefits.

(4) Upon request, a public agency shall provide to the person requesting access to or copies of public records pursuant to this section an itemized statement of costs incurred by the public agency and charged to such requester. Such itemized statement shall include, but not be limited to, the hourly rates charged for each employee involved in making the requested records available and an itemized list of any other fees charged to provide access to or furnish copies of the requested records.

(5) Fees for access to or copies of public records of public agencies within the legislative branch of the state government shall be established in accordance with K.S.A. 46-1207a, and amendments thereto, and the provisions of this section.

(6) Fees for access to or copies of public records of public agencies within the judicial branch of the state government shall be established in accordance with rules of the supreme court and the provisions of this section.

(7) Fees for access to or copies of public records of a public agency within the executive branch of the state government shall be established in accordance with the provisions of this section by the agency head.

(d) Any person requesting records within the executive branch may appeal the reasonableness of the fees charged for providing access to or furnishing copies of such records to the secretary of administration, whose decision shall be final.

(e) (1) When the staff time needed to respond to a records request will exceed five hours or the estimated actual cost for staff time needed to fill the request exceeds $200, the public agency shall make reasonable efforts to contact the requester and engage in interactive communication about mitigating costs to fill the request. The requester is not obligated to mitigate costs.

(2) If a public agency has made reasonable efforts to contact the requester pursuant to this section and the requester has failed to respond by the end of the third business day, the records request will be deemed to be withdrawn until a subsequent contact has been made by the requester to the public agency.

(3) As used in this subsection, "reasonable efforts to contact the requester" means contacting the requester through the means of communication that the requester provided to be used by the agency to respond to the request.

(f) Except as otherwise authorized pursuant to K.S.A. 75-4215, and amendments thereto, each public agency within the executive branch of the state government shall remit all moneys received by or for it from fees charged pursuant to this section to the state treasurer in accordance with K.S.A. 75-4215, and amendments thereto. Unless otherwise specifically provided by law, the state treasurer shall deposit the entire amount thereof in the state treasury and credit the same to the state general fund or an appropriate fee fund as determined by the agency head.

(g) Each public agency of a political or taxing subdivision shall remit all moneys received by or for it from fees charged pursuant to this act to the treasurer of such political or taxing subdivision at least monthly. Upon receipt of any such moneys, such treasurer shall deposit the entire amount thereof in the treasury of the political or taxing subdivision and credit the same to the general fund thereof, unless otherwise specifically provided by law.

(h) Any person who is a certified shorthand reporter may charge fees for transcripts of such person's notes of judicial or administrative proceedings in accordance with rates established pursuant to rules of the Kansas supreme court.

(i) Nothing in the open records act shall require a public agency to electronically make copies of public records by allowing a person to obtain copies of a public record by inserting, connecting or otherwise attaching an electronic device provided by such person to the computer or other electronic device of the public agency.

History: L. 1984, ch. 187, § 5; L. 1984, ch. 282; § 2; L. 1994, ch. 100, § 1; L. 1995, ch. 135, § 1; L. 2010, ch. 112, § 1; L. 2025, ch. 89, § 1; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1999–2025 · leading case: Baker v. Hayden, 490 P.3d 1164 (Kan. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Baker v. Hayden, 490 P.3d 1164 (Kan. 2021). · cites it 11× “But copying is covered in a separate statute, K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219. Its subsection (a) permits any person to make abstracts or copies of public records themselves, or obtain copies of those records through the public agency that has them, with restrictions on that…”
Data Tree, LLC v. Meek, 109 P.3d 1226 (Kan. 2005). · cites it 9× “Pursuant to K.S.A. 45-219, all costs of producing records including the cost of redaction are to be borne by [Data Tree] as the requestor — which is similar to litigation costs where the party requesting the records is responsible for the cost of production.”
Baker v. Hayden, 419 P.3d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 6× “See K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 45-219(a) ("Any person may make abstracts or obtain copies of any public record to which such person has access under this act.”
Perry v. Bd. of Franklin Cnty. Comm'rs, 132 P.3d 1279 (Kan. 2006). “Such clerk shall also deliver to any person who may demand it, a certified copy of any record in such clerk’s office, or any account on file therein, on receiving from such person a fee in accordance with a schedule of fees established pursuant to subsection (c) of K.S.A.…”
Hunter Health Clinic v. Wichita State Univ., 362 P.3d 10 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). “” (Emphasis added.) K.S.A. 45-218(b). And, “[a]ny person may make abstracts or obtain copies of any public records to which such person has access under this act.”
State v. Stevens, 992 P.2d 1244 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999). “The Open Records Act also establishes a list of *609 public records that are not subject to mandatory disclosure.”
In re Jordan, 518 P.3d 1203 (Kan. 2022). “K.S.A. 45-219(a) makes that point clear by providing: "A public agency shall not be required to provide copies of radio or recording tapes or discs, video tapes or films, pictures, slides, graphics, illustrations or similar audio or visual items or devices, unless such items or…”
Roe v. Phillips (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 11× “The Hospital argues that the plain language of K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219—read together and in harmony with related provisions of KORA—unequivocally shows that KORA does not require production of public records in native-based electronic format or the specific format requested by…”
Roe v. Phillips Cnty. Hosp. (Kan. 2023). · cites it 5× “The plain language of K.S.A. 45-219(a) requires a public agency, upon request, to provide a copy of a public record in the format in which it maintains that record.”
Hammet v. Schwab, 518 P.3d 48 (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219(c)(1). The fees for providing access to records maintained on computer facilities shall include only the cost of any computer services including staff time required.”
Clark v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 287, 416 P.3d 1032 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 45-219 ; K.S.A. 2017 Supp.”
Brooke v. Reed, 2025 OK 86 (Okla. 2025). · cites it 2× “" But to confirm the validity of the panel's application of this logic to electronic records, we must also consider the meaning of "public records," to which the term "copies" applies in K.S.A. 45-219(a). On this point, KORA clarifies that "'[p]ublic record' means any recorded…”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 45-219(a) — 8 cases
Baker v. Hayden, 490 P.3d 1164 (Kan. 2021). “But copying is covered in a separate statute, K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219. Its subsection (a) permits any person to make abstracts or copies of public records themselves, or obtain copies of those records through the public agency that has them, with restrictions on that…”
Baker v. Hayden, 419 P.3d 31 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018). “See K.S.A. 2017 Supp. 45-219(a) ("Any person may make abstracts or obtain copies of any public record to which such person has access under this act.”
Data Tree, LLC v. Meek, 109 P.3d 1226 (Kan. 2005). “Pursuant to K.S.A. 45-219, all costs of producing records including the cost of redaction are to be borne by [Data Tree] as the requestor — which is similar to litigation costs where the party requesting the records is responsible for the cost of production.”
Hunter Health Clinic v. Wichita State Univ., 362 P.3d 10 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). “” (Emphasis added.) K.S.A. 45-218(b). And, “[a]ny person may make abstracts or obtain copies of any public records to which such person has access under this act.”
In re Jordan, 518 P.3d 1203 (Kan. 2022). “K.S.A. 45-219(a) makes that point clear by providing: "A public agency shall not be required to provide copies of radio or recording tapes or discs, video tapes or films, pictures, slides, graphics, illustrations or similar audio or visual items or devices, unless such items or…”
— K.S.A. § 45-219(b) — 2 cases
Data Tree, LLC v. Meek, 109 P.3d 1226 (Kan. 2005). “Pursuant to K.S.A. 45-219, all costs of producing records including the cost of redaction are to be borne by [Data Tree] as the requestor — which is similar to litigation costs where the party requesting the records is responsible for the cost of production.”
Roe v. Phillips (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “The Hospital argues that the plain language of K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219—read together and in harmony with related provisions of KORA—unequivocally shows that KORA does not require production of public records in native-based electronic format or the specific format requested by…”
— K.S.A. § 45-219(c) — 1 case
Data Tree, LLC v. Meek, 109 P.3d 1226 (Kan. 2005). “Pursuant to K.S.A. 45-219, all costs of producing records including the cost of redaction are to be borne by [Data Tree] as the requestor — which is similar to litigation costs where the party requesting the records is responsible for the cost of production.”
— K.S.A. § 45-219(c)(1) — 3 cases
Data Tree, LLC v. Meek, 109 P.3d 1226 (Kan. 2005). “Pursuant to K.S.A. 45-219, all costs of producing records including the cost of redaction are to be borne by [Data Tree] as the requestor — which is similar to litigation costs where the party requesting the records is responsible for the cost of production.”
Hammet v. Schwab, 518 P.3d 48 (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219(c)(1). The fees for providing access to records maintained on computer facilities shall include only the cost of any computer services including staff time required.”
Roe v. Phillips (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “The Hospital argues that the plain language of K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219—read together and in harmony with related provisions of KORA—unequivocally shows that KORA does not require production of public records in native-based electronic format or the specific format requested by…”
— K.S.A. § 45-219(c)(2) — 1 case
Hammet v. Schwab, 518 P.3d 48 (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219(c)(1). The fees for providing access to records maintained on computer facilities shall include only the cost of any computer services including staff time required.”
— K.S.A. § 45-219(g) — 2 cases
Roe v. Phillips (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “The Hospital argues that the plain language of K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 45-219—read together and in harmony with related provisions of KORA—unequivocally shows that KORA does not require production of public records in native-based electronic format or the specific format requested by…”
Roe v. Phillips Cnty. Hosp. (Kan. 2023). “The plain language of K.S.A. 45-219(a) requires a public agency, upon request, to provide a copy of a public record in the format in which it maintains that record.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.