Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 50-149 (2026)

Unfair discriminations

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-149. Unfair discriminations. Any person, foreign or domestic, doing business in the state of Kansas, and engaged in the production, manufacture, distribution, sale or purchase of any commodity in general use, that shall intentionally for the purpose of destroying competition, discriminate between the different sections, communities, or cities of this state, by buying at a higher rate or selling at a lower rate, any such commodity, in one section, community or city, or any portion thereof, than is charged or paid for such commodity in other section, community, or city, after equalizing the distance from the point of production to the factory, for distribution, and freight rates therefrom, shall be in violation with the provisions of this act.

History: L. 1915, ch. 368, § 2; R.S. 1923, 50-149; L. 2000, ch. 136, § 21; July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1995–2020 · leading case: Cease v. Safelite Glass Corp., 911 F. Supp. 477 (D. Kan. 1995).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Cease v. Safelite Glass Corp., 911 F. Supp. 477 (D. Kan. 1995). · cites it 17× “2 This case comes before the court upon Safelite’s motion for summary judgment on Cease’s claim based upon its alleged violation of K.S.A. 50-149. Safelite contends that Cease cannot demonstrate the existence of a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.”

Cease v. Safelite Glass Corp., 927 F. Supp. 1452 (D. Kan. 1996). · cites it 21× “On November 15,1995, the court entered a memorandum and order denying Safelite Glass Corporation’s (Safelite) motion for summary judgment on Frank Cease’s claim based upon Safelite’s alleged violation of K.S.A. 50-149. See Cease v. Safelite Glass Corp.”

H&C Animal Health, LLC v. CEVA Animal Health, LLC (D. Kan. 2020). · cites it 4× “§ 13 (a) and (c); 4) price discrimination under the Kansas Restraint of Trade Act, K.S.A. 50-149; 5) a claim for specific performance under K.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.