K.S.A. » Chapter 50
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 50-646 (2026)

Other remedies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

50-646. Other remedies. Nothing in this act shall in any way limit or affect the rights or remedies which are otherwise available to a consumer under the uniform consumer credit code, or to any person under the uniform commercial code, or to any person under this or any other law statutory or otherwise.

History: L. 1985, ch. 39, § 2; L. 1989, ch. 160, § 2; July 1.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Cited; punitive damages award for fraud, attorney fees award even though factor in considering punitive damages examined. Equitable Life Leasing Corp. v. Abbick, 243 Kan. 513, 515, 757 P.2d 304 (1988).

2. Violation of act does not defeat a valid mechanic's lien (K.S.A. 58-201 et seq.). Farrell v. General Motors Corp., 249 Kan. 231, 245, 815 P.2d 538 (1991).

Cross References to Related Sections:

Unlawful acts concerning odometers, see 21-5835.

Law Review and Bar Journal References:

"Recent Developments in Kansas Consumer Law," Daniel P. Kolditz, J.K.T.L.A. Vol. XV, No. 3, 17, 19 (1992).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–2011 · leading case: Louisburg Bldg. & Dev't Co. v. Albright, 252 P.3d 597 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Louisburg Bldg. & Dev't Co. v. Albright, 252 P.3d 597 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 3× “" K.S.A. 50-646. Construing these three provisions in harmony, it seems unlikely that the legislature intended the KCPA to limit the recovery of damages under common-law theories of liability.”
Equitable Life Leasing Corp. v. Abbick, 757 P.2d 304 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “K.S.A. 1987 Supp. 50-646. Moore’s contention that the claims for breach of contract and *516 fraud are inconsistent is also without merit.”
Farrell v. Gen. Motors Corp., 815 P.2d 538 (Kan. 1991). “Secondly, the KCPA provides for civil damages for wrongful acts under it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.