Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 54-105 (2026)
Falsifying oaths or affirmations
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
54-105. Falsifying oaths or affirmations. All oaths and affirmations alike subject the party who shall falsify them to the pains and penalties of perjury.
History: G.S. 1868, ch. 72, § 5; October 31; R.S. 1923, 54-105.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1967–2025 · leading case: McCormick v. Bd. of Shawnee Cnty. Comm'rs, 24 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).
McCormick v. Bd. of Shawnee Cnty. Comm'rs, 24 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001). “See K.S.A. 54-105; K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 21-3805.”
State v. Rodriquez-Garcia, 937 P.2d 446 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997). “” Moreover, K.S.A. 54-105 provides that “[a]ll oaths and affirmations alike subject the party who shall falsify them to the pains and penalties of perjury.”
Ehrenreich v. Londerholm, 273 F. Supp. 178 (D. Kan. 1967). “K.S.A. 54-105 provides: ‘54-105. Falsifying oaths or affirmations.”
State v. Adams, 563 P.3d 719 (Kan. 2025). “A witness cannot invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to avoid testifying based on the risk of a future perjury prosecution for providing false or inconsistent testimony.”
State v. Adams, 547 P.3d 593 (Kan. Ct. App. 2024). “" K.S.A. 54-105. The above requirement has been in our Kansas state statutes since statehood.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.