Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 56-1a253 (2026)

General partners' powers and liabilities

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

56-1a253. General partners' powers and liabilities. (a) Except as provided in this act or in the partnership agreement, a general partner of a limited partnership has the rights and powers and is subject to the restrictions of a partner in a partnership without limited partners.

(b) Except as provided in this act, a general partner of a limited partnership has the liabilities of a partner in a partnership without limited partners to persons other than the partnership and the other partners.

(c) Except as provided in this act or in the partnership agreement, a general partner of a limited partnership has the liabilities of a partner in a partnership without limited partners to the partnership and to the other partners.

History: L. 1983, ch. 88, § 25; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–2008 · leading case: In re Est. of Hjersted, 175 P.3d 810 (Kan. 2008).
In re Est. of Hjersted, 175 P.3d 810 (Kan. 2008). “See K.S.A. 56-1a253(a) (powers of the general partners); K.”
Temple v. White Lakes Plaza Assocs., Ltd., 816 P.2d 399 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “See K.S.A. 56-1a253(a). Marianna argues that the above RULPA provisions allowing for restrictions on the admission of substituted limited partners should not be applied to a partner’s involuntary assignment of his or her interest, such as that ordered by a divorce decree.”
K.S.A. § 56-1a253(a): 2 cases
In re Est. of Hjersted, 175 P.3d 810 (Kan. 2008). “See K.S.A. 56-1a253(a) (powers of the general partners); K.”
Temple v. White Lakes Plaza Assocs., Ltd., 816 P.2d 399 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “See K.S.A. 56-1a253(a). Marianna argues that the above RULPA provisions allowing for restrictions on the admission of substituted limited partners should not be applied to a partner’s involuntary assignment of his or her interest, such as that ordered by a divorce decree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.