Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 56-308 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

56-308.

History: L. 1972, ch. 210, § 8; Repealed, L. 1998, ch. 93, § 76; July 1, 1999.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. Partner-spouse as occupying very different position from that of spouse alone examined. In re Oetinger, 49 B.R. 41, 43 (1985).

2. Farmer debtor's wife, herself a farmer debtor, as not entitled to exempt farm equipment as tools of her trade examined. In re Goebel, 75 B.R. 385, 387 (1987).

3. Whether debtor had interest in partnership property to use bankruptcy lien avoidance provision on property claimed exempt examined. In re Kane, 167 B.R. 224, 226 (1993).


Previous | Next

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1985–2019 · leading case: In Re Oetinger, 49 B.R. 41 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Oetinger, 49 B.R. 41 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1985). · cites it 2× “All property acquired by a partnership is partnership property, K.S.A. § 56-308(a), in which each partner has an interest, K.”
Stephens v. Ainsworth, 437 P.3d 51 (Kan. Ct. App. 2019). “" K.S.A. 56-308 (Furse 1994). We find no material difference between the two Acts, as applicable here.”
In Re Kane, 167 B.R. 224 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1993). “K.S.A. 56-308(a), -325(a). The hens that debtors seek to avoid attached to the property in question when that property was owned by the Kane-Nelson Partnership.”
In Re Goebel, 75 B.R. 385 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1987). “, K.S.A. 56-308, 58-325; see also Grannell v.”
— K.S.A. § 56-308(a) — 2 cases
In Re Oetinger, 49 B.R. 41 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1985). “All property acquired by a partnership is partnership property, K.S.A. § 56-308(a), in which each partner has an interest, K.”
In Re Kane, 167 B.R. 224 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1993). “K.S.A. 56-308(a), -325(a). The hens that debtors seek to avoid attached to the property in question when that property was owned by the Kane-Nelson Partnership.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.