K.S.A. » Chapter 56
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 56-327 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

56-327.

History: L. 1972, ch. 210, § 27; Repealed, L. 1998, ch. 93, § 76; July 1, 1999.

CASE ANNOTATIONS

1. A partner's assignment of rights under a contract for the sale of a partnership asset was valid; affirmed. Wellsville Bank v. Nicolay, 7 Kan. App. 2d 172, 174, 638 P.2d 975 (1982).

2. Cited; disposition of partnership interests under charging orders examined. City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 12 Kan. App. 2d 490, 498, 749 P.2d 505 (1988).

3. Cited; charging order (K.S.A. 56-328) creating lien when served as superior to assignment constituting prior unperfected security interest noted. City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 242 Kan. 875, 881, 891, 752 P.2d 673 (1988).

4. Applicability of restrictions on partnership admission in limited partnership agreement (K.S.A. 56-1a101 et seq.) to involuntary transfers of partnership interests examined. Temple v. White Lakes Plaza Assocs., Ltd., 15 Kan. App. 2d 771, 779, 816 P.2d 399 (1991).


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1991 · leading case: City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988). · cites it 2× “” K.S.A. 56-327, however, does permit a partner to assign his or her interest in the partnership itself, but such an assignment “merely entitles the assignee to receive in accordance with his or her contract the profits to which the assigning partner would otherwise be entitled.”
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 505 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “” K.S.A. 56-327(a) states: “A conveyance by a partner of his or her interest in the partnership does not of itself dissolve the partnership, nor, as against the other partners in the absence of agreement, entitle the assignee, during the continuance of the partnership, to…”
Temple v. White Lakes Plaza Assocs., Ltd., 816 P.2d 399 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “Under the specific terms of the limited partnership agreement in this case, the assignee of a partner’s interest in the partnership is not entitled to participate in the management of the partnership or to obtain information about the partnership or its books, but is entitled…”
— K.S.A. § 56-327(a) — 3 cases
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 752 P.2d 673 (Kan. 1988). “” K.S.A. 56-327, however, does permit a partner to assign his or her interest in the partnership itself, but such an assignment “merely entitles the assignee to receive in accordance with his or her contract the profits to which the assigning partner would otherwise be entitled.”
City of Arkansas City v. Anderson, 749 P.2d 505 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988). “” K.S.A. 56-327(a) states: “A conveyance by a partner of his or her interest in the partnership does not of itself dissolve the partnership, nor, as against the other partners in the absence of agreement, entitle the assignee, during the continuance of the partnership, to…”
Temple v. White Lakes Plaza Assocs., Ltd., 816 P.2d 399 (Kan. Ct. App. 1991). “Under the specific terms of the limited partnership agreement in this case, the assignee of a partner’s interest in the partnership is not entitled to participate in the management of the partnership or to obtain information about the partnership or its books, but is entitled…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.