Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-1610 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-1610.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1610; L. 1965, ch. 355, § 6; L. 1975, ch. 305, § 1; L. 1976, ch. 256, § 1; L. 1978, ch. 231, § 30; L. 1979, ch. 185, § 1; L. 1980, ch. 175, § 2; L. 1981, ch. 236, § 1; L. 1982, ch. 152, § 9; L. 1983, ch. 199, § 1; L. 1985, ch. 144, § 6; L. 1985, ch. 115, § 48; L. 1986, ch. 218, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 219, § 1; L. 1986, ch. 137, § 25; L. 1988, ch. 215, § 1; L. 1991, ch. 171, § 2; L. 1992, ch. 273, § 2; L. 1995, ch. 268, § 2; L. 1996, ch. 186, § 2; L. 1997, ch. 182, § 4; L. 1998, ch. 162, § 3; L. 2000, ch. 171, § 15; L. 2001, ch. 195, § 7; L. 2005, ch. 154, § 2; L. 2006, ch. 200, § 108; L. 2007, ch. 162, § 2; L. 2008, ch. 127, § 2; L. 2010, ch. 75, § 21; Repealed, L. 2011, ch. 26, § 47; July 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 316 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1966–2025 · leading case: In Re the Marriage of Traster, 339 P.3d 778 (Kan. 2014).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In Re the Marriage of Traster, 339 P.3d 778 (Kan. 2014). · cites it 108× “23-201, which gives each spouse a common interest in the 8 marital property until the district court finalizes the property division under K.S.A. 60-1610. In his petition, David did not refer to or provide the court with the couple's 2004 agreement.”

Sheppard v. Sheppard, 630 P.2d 1121 (Kan. 1981). · cites it 22× “The controlling issue on appeal is the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 60-1610( b )(2), a new paragraph added to the statute in 1980.”

Brady v. Brady, 592 P.2d 865 (Kan. 1979). · cites it 20× “Generally a proper motion, notice to the adverse party and an opportunity to be heard are prerequisites to a modification of a child support order under K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 60-1610( a ). See Strecker v.”

In Re the Marriage of Killman, 955 P.2d 1228 (Kan. 1998). · cites it 10× “As to the mother’s argument that there was no statutory authority for the district court to change fhe child’s name, the Court of Appeals pointed out that K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 60-1610 provides, in part: “ ‘A decree in an action under this article may include orders on the following…”

In Re the Marriage of Hair, 193 P.3d 504 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 16× “23-201(b) and K.S.A.2007 Supp. 60-1610(b). Terry argues that the district court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside the World Savings accounts to him and maintains *509 that the division was fair and equitable.”

In Re the Marriage of Vandenberg, 229 P.3d 1187 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 12× “’s desires as to residency (K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 60-1610[a][3][B][iii]), the trial court’s comments demonstrate drat it considered but did not find T.”

In re the Marriage of Brown, 291 P.3d 55 (Kan. 2012). · cites it 14× “Instead, the legislature moved the provision regarding modifying orders, other tiran ex parte orders, to tire statute relating to divorce decrees, K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 60-1610. The legislature made this intent clear by adding the word “prior” to a sentence that authorized the…”

In Re the Marriage of Sommers, 792 P.2d 1005 (Kan. 1990). · cites it 18× “The Maxwell article previously referred to traces the amendments to K.S.A. 60-1610 as follows: "The new section on the division of property does very little to change the status of the law.”

In re the Marriage of Bradley, 899 P.2d 471 (Kan. 1995). · cites it 14× “In her brief to the Court of Appeals, Barbara stated the issue as follows: “Did the Court err in changing the custody of the two minor children from [Barbara to Dean] without any legal finding or evidence of ‘material change of circumstances’ or any legal finding or evidence…”

Harrison v. Tauheed, 256 P.3d 851 (Kan. 2011). · cites it 10× “” Although such a pattern may govern when a change in custodial status is sought, see K.S.A. 60-1610(a)(2) (court may change any prior order of custody, residency, visitation, parenting time when material change of circumstances shown), it does not govern an initial custody…”

In re the Marriage of Traster, 291 P.3d 494 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 17× “We should note drat we have cited to K.S.A. 60-1610, which was in effect when the parties executed their postmarital agreement and when David filed for divorce.”

Powell v. Powell, 648 P.2d 218 (Kan. 1982). · cites it 8× “2d 349 (1979): “Pursuant to this statute [K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-1610(/¡)], the district court is vested with wide discretion to determine both the amount and the recipient of an allowance of attorney fees.”

Show all 316 citing cases →

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(4) — 1 case

In Re the Marriage of Roth, 987 P.2d 1134 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(J) — 2 cases

Cook v. Cook, 646 P.2d 464 (Kan. 1982).

Scimeca v. Scimeca, 561 P.2d 904 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a) — 50 cases

Brady v. Brady, 592 P.2d 865 (Kan. 1979). “Generally a proper motion, notice to the adverse party and an opportunity to be heard are prerequisites to a modification of a child support order under K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 60-1610( a ). See Strecker v.”

In Re the Marriage of Steven, 48 P.3d 1284 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

Larsen v. Larsen, 615 P.2d 806 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).

Sheppard v. Sheppard, 630 P.2d 1121 (Kan. 1981). “The controlling issue on appeal is the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 60-1610( b )(2), a new paragraph added to the statute in 1980.”

Skillett v. Sierra, 53 P.3d 1234 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(1) — 16 cases

In Re the Marriage of Steven, 48 P.3d 1284 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

In Re the Marriage of Case, 879 P.2d 632 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).

In re the Marriage of Leedy, 109 P.3d 1130 (Kan. 2005).

In Re the Marriage of Doetzl, 65 P.3d 539 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).

In Re the Marriage of Jones, 268 P.3d 494 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(1)(A) — 2 cases

Morrison v. Morrison, 781 P.2d 745 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989).

In Re the Marriage of Sell, 61 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(1)(B) — 6 cases

Hill v. Hill, 763 P.2d 640 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988).

In Re the Marriage of Sell, 61 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).

In re the Marriage of Bunting, 900 P.2d 862 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

In re the Marriage of VanBuren, 102 P.3d 486 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

Holden v. Holden, 957 F. Supp. 1204 (D. Kan. 1997).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(1)(C) — 6 cases

In re the Marriage of Bunting, 912 P.2d 165 (Kan. 1996).

Kleinsorge v. Kleinsorge, 28 P.3d 434 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

Glassman v. Costello, 986 P.2d 1050 (Kan. 1999).

In Re the Marriage of Sell, 61 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).

In re the Marriage of Bunting, 900 P.2d 862 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(2) — 8 cases

In Re the Marriage of Rayman, 47 P.3d 413 (Kan. 2002).

Johnson v. Stephenson, 15 P.3d 359 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

Harrison v. Tauheed, 256 P.3d 851 (Kan. 2011). “” Although such a pattern may govern when a change in custodial status is sought, see K.S.A. 60-1610(a)(2) (court may change any prior order of custody, residency, visitation, parenting time when material change of circumstances shown), it does not govern an initial custody…”

In re the Marriage of Bradley, 899 P.2d 471 (Kan. 1995). “In her brief to the Court of Appeals, Barbara stated the issue as follows: “Did the Court err in changing the custody of the two minor children from [Barbara to Dean] without any legal finding or evidence of ‘material change of circumstances’ or any legal finding or evidence…”

In re the Marriage of Kimbrell, 119 P.3d 684 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(2)(A) — 9 cases

In Re the Marriage of Whipp, 962 P.2d 1058 (Kan. 1998).

In re the Marriage of Nelson, 125 P.3d 1081 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).

Harrison v. TAUHEED, 235 P.3d 547 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3) — 13 cases

In Re the Marriage of Vandenberg, 229 P.3d 1187 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). “’s desires as to residency (K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 60-1610[a][3][B][iii]), the trial court’s comments demonstrate drat it considered but did not find T.”

Johnson v. Stephenson, 15 P.3d 359 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

Werner v. Kliewer, 710 P.2d 1250 (Kan. 1985).

In re the Marriage of Nelson, 125 P.3d 1081 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(A) — 6 cases

Johnson v. Stephenson, 15 P.3d 359 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

In re the Marriage of Nelson, 125 P.3d 1081 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006).

Talbot v. Pearson, 82 P.3d 854 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

In re the Marriage of Jennings, 50 P.3d 506 (Kan. Ct. App. 2002).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B) — 20 cases

In re the Marriage of Kimbrell, 119 P.3d 684 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

Harrison v. TAUHEED, 235 P.3d 547 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

In re the Marriage of Williams, 90 P.3d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B)(i) — 2 cases

State v. Dreiling, 54 P.3d 475 (Kan. 2002).

Harrison v. TAUHEED, 235 P.3d 547 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B)(iii) — 2 cases

In Re the Marriage of Talkington, 762 P.2d 843 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B)(iv) — 2 cases

Cheney v. Poore, 339 P.3d 1220 (Kan. 2014).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B)(v) — 2 cases

Harrison v. TAUHEED, 235 P.3d 547 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

In re the Marriage of Williams, 90 P.3d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B)(vi) — 2 cases

Dickison v. Dickison, 874 P.2d 695 (Kan. Ct. App. 1994).

M. L. M. ex rel. Froggatte v. Millen, 15 P.3d 857 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(B)(vii) — 1 case

In re the Marriage of Williams, 90 P.3d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(3)(C) — 1 case

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(4) — 5 cases

Talbot v. Pearson, 82 P.3d 854 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

In Re the Marriage of Roth, 987 P.2d 1134 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).

Harrison v. TAUHEED, 235 P.3d 547 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

In Re the Marriage of Debenham, 896 P.2d 1098 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

In re the Marriage of Hutchison, 281 P.3d 1126 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(4)(A) — 8 cases

In Re the Marriage of Killman, 955 P.2d 1228 (Kan. 1998). “As to the mother’s argument that there was no statutory authority for the district court to change fhe child’s name, the Court of Appeals pointed out that K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 60-1610 provides, in part: “ ‘A decree in an action under this article may include orders on the following…”

Harrison v. TAUHEED, 235 P.3d 547 (Kan. Ct. App. 2010).

Yordy v. Osterman, 149 P.3d 874 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).

In Re the Marriage of Roth, 987 P.2d 1134 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).

Talbot v. Pearson, 82 P.3d 854 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(4)(B) — 1 case

Yoder v. Yoder, 721 P.2d 294 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(4)(D) — 4 cases

State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Clubb, 39 P.3d 80 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

In Re the Marriage of Osborne, 901 P.2d 12 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

In Re the Marriage of Burbank, 932 P.2d 466 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).

Tindell v. Tindell, 690 P.2d 965 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(4)(D)(iii) — 2 cases

In Re the Marriage of Burbank, 932 P.2d 466 (Kan. Ct. App. 1997).

State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Clubb, 39 P.3d 80 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(5) — 2 cases

In re the Marriage of Williams, 90 P.3d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

Talbot v. Pearson, 82 P.3d 854 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(5)(B) — 2 cases

In re the Marriage of Williams, 90 P.3d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

Cheney v. Poore, 339 P.3d 1220 (Kan. 2014).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(5)(C) — 1 case

State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Clubb, 39 P.3d 80 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(l) — 25 cases

In re the Marriage of Brown, 291 P.3d 55 (Kan. 2012). “Instead, the legislature moved the provision regarding modifying orders, other tiran ex parte orders, to tire statute relating to divorce decrees, K.S.A. 1982 Supp. 60-1610. The legislature made this intent clear by adding the word “prior” to a sentence that authorized the…”

In Re the Marriage of Burton, 28 P.3d 427 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

In Re the Marriage of VanderVoort, 185 P.3d 289 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008).

In re the Marriage of Bunting, 912 P.2d 165 (Kan. 1996).

In Re the Marriage of Kasper, 27 P.3d 948 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(l)(A) — 3 cases

Morrison v. Morrison, 781 P.2d 745 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989).

In Re the Marriage of Sell, 61 P.3d 739 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).

In re the Marriage of Funk, 107 P.3d 447 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(l)(B) — 5 cases

Morrison v. Morrison, 781 P.2d 745 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989).

In Re the Marriage of Kasper, 27 P.3d 948 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

Hill v. Hill, 763 P.2d 640 (Kan. Ct. App. 1988).

In re the Marriage of VanBuren, 102 P.3d 486 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004).

In re the Marriage of Funk, 107 P.3d 447 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(a)(l)(C) — 4 cases

In re the Marriage of Bunting, 912 P.2d 165 (Kan. 1996).

Kleinsorge v. Kleinsorge, 28 P.3d 434 (Kan. Ct. App. 2001).

In re the Marriage of Bunting, 900 P.2d 862 (Kan. Ct. App. 1995).

In re the Marriage of Funk, 107 P.3d 447 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b) — 36 cases

In Re the Marriage of Hair, 193 P.3d 504 (Kan. Ct. App. 2008). “23-201(b) and K.S.A.2007 Supp. 60-1610(b). Terry argues that the district court did not abuse its discretion in setting aside the World Savings accounts to him and maintains *509 that the division was fair and equitable.”

In Re the Marriage of Traster, 339 P.3d 778 (Kan. 2014). “23-201, which gives each spouse a common interest in the 8 marital property until the district court finalizes the property division under K.S.A. 60-1610. In his petition, David did not refer to or provide the court with the couple's 2004 agreement.”

In Re Marriage of Cray, 867 P.2d 291 (Kan. 1994).

Frazier v. Goudschaal, 295 P.3d 542 (Kan. 2013).

In Re the Marriage of Sedbrook, 827 P.2d 1222 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(1) — 19 cases

In Re the Marriage of Sommers, 792 P.2d 1005 (Kan. 1990). “The Maxwell article previously referred to traces the amendments to K.S.A. 60-1610 as follows: "The new section on the division of property does very little to change the status of the law.”

In Re the Marriage of Rodriguez, 969 P.2d 880 (Kan. 1998).

In re the Marriage of Monslow, 912 P.2d 735 (Kan. 1996).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(1)(C) — 1 case

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(2) — 38 cases

Sheppard v. Sheppard, 630 P.2d 1121 (Kan. 1981). “The controlling issue on appeal is the constitutionality of K.S.A. 1980 Supp. 60-1610( b )(2), a new paragraph added to the statute in 1980.”

In Re the Marriage of Strieby, 255 P.3d 34 (Kan. Ct. App. 2011).

In re the Marriage of Ehinger, 121 P.3d 467 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

In re the Marriage of Monslow, 912 P.2d 735 (Kan. 1996).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(3) — 38 cases

In re the Marriage of Traster, 291 P.3d 494 (Kan. Ct. App. 2012). “We should note drat we have cited to K.S.A. 60-1610, which was in effect when the parties executed their postmarital agreement and when David filed for divorce.”

In Re the Marriage of Patterson, 920 P.2d 450 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).

In Re the Marriage of Takusagawa, 166 P.3d 440 (Kan. Ct. App. 2007).

In re the Est. of McLeish, 307 P.3d 221 (Kan. Ct. App. 2013).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(3)(A) — 1 case

In re the Marriage of Hedrick, 911 P.2d 192 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(3)(B) — 1 case

In re the Marriage of Yount, 122 P.3d 1175 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(4) — 20 cases

Snider v. Am. Fam. Mut. Ins. Co., 298 F.3d 1120 (Kan. 2013).

Evans v. Provident Life & Accident Ins., 815 P.2d 550 (Kan. 1991).

In Re the Marriage of Patterson, 920 P.2d 450 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).

Vanover v. Vanover, 987 P.2d 1105 (Kan. Ct. App. 1999).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(l) — 19 cases

Nicholas v. Nicholas, 83 P.3d 214 (Kan. 2004).

In Re the Marriage of Schwien, 839 P.2d 541 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).

In Re the Marriage of Sedbrook, 827 P.2d 1222 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(l)(B) — 1 case

In Re the Marriage of Roth, 11 P.3d 514 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(b)(l)(C) — 1 case

In Re the Marriage of Roth, 11 P.3d 514 (Kan. Ct. App. 2000).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(c) — 13 cases

In re the Marriage of Pfeifer, 907 P.2d 818 (Kan. 1995).

Guffy Ex Rel. Reeves v. Guffy, 631 P.2d 646 (Kan. 1981).

Linson v. Johnson, 575 P.2d 504 (Kan. 1978).

Wachholz v. Wachholz, 603 P.2d 647 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(c)(2) — 1 case

In Re the Marriage of Sedbrook, 827 P.2d 1222 (Kan. Ct. App. 1992).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(d) — 18 cases

Martin v. Martin, 623 P.2d 527 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).

Powell v. Powell, 648 P.2d 218 (Kan. 1982). “2d 349 (1979): “Pursuant to this statute [K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-1610(/¡)], the district court is vested with wide discretion to determine both the amount and the recipient of an allowance of attorney fees.”

Gronquist v. Gronquist, 644 P.2d 1365 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(e) — 12 cases

In Re the Est. of Loughmiller, 629 P.2d 156 (Kan. 1981).

Cook v. Cook, 638 P.2d 980 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982).

Lewis v. Lewis, 603 P.2d 650 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).

In Re the Marriage of Jones, 921 P.2d 839 (Kan. Ct. App. 1996).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(f) — 1 case

May v. May, 626 P.2d 801 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(fc) — 3 cases

Cady v. Cady, 581 P.2d 358 (Kan. 1978).

Wachholz v. Wachholz, 603 P.2d 647 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(fe) — 2 cases

Cady v. Cady, 581 P.2d 358 (Kan. 1978).

Grant v. Grant, 685 P.2d 327 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(g) — 9 cases

Barnett & Lerner, Chartered v. King (In Re King), 15 B.R. 127 (Bankr. D. Kan. 1981).

Neis v. Neis, 599 P.2d 305 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).

Cook v. Cook, 638 P.2d 980 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982).

Olsen v. Olsen, 643 P.2d 1153 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982).

Miller v. Miller, 627 P.2d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(h) — 6 cases

Cady v. Cady, 581 P.2d 358 (Kan. 1978).

Grant v. Grant, 685 P.2d 327 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984).

Martin v. Martin, 623 P.2d 527 (Kan. Ct. App. 1981).

Reich v. Reich, 680 P.2d 545 (Kan. 1984).

In Re the Marriage of Cray, 846 P.2d 944 (Kan. Ct. App. 1993).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(h)(1) — 1 case

Reich v. Reich, 680 P.2d 545 (Kan. 1984).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(i) — 1 case

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(o) — 6 cases

Larsen v. Larsen, 615 P.2d 806 (Kan. Ct. App. 1980).

Nixon v. Nixon, 596 P.2d 1238 (Kan. 1979).

Lillis v. Lillis, 563 P.2d 492 (Kan. Ct. App. 1977).

Stapel v. Stapel, 601 P.2d 1176 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979).

State Ex Rel. Sec'y of Soc. & Rehab. Servs. v. Castro, 684 P.2d 379 (Kan. 1984).

— K.S.A. § 60-1610(o)(i) — 1 case

Beebe v. Chavez, 602 P.2d 1279 (Kan. 1979).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.