Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 60-2606 (2026)
Availability of other relief
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
60-2606. Availability of other relief. If a case arises in which an action or proceeding for the enforcement or protection of a substantive right, or the redress or prevention of a wrong, cannot be had under any specific provisions of this chapter or other statutes then the court shall proceed as nearly in conformity with the provisions of this chapter as the circumstances permit to do whatever law and equity and justice require for the protection of the parties.
History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-2606; January 1, 1964.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1980–2022 · leading case: State v. Kingsley, 326 P.3d 1083 (Kan. 2014).
State v. Kingsley, 326 P.3d 1083 (Kan. 2014). “60-260(b)(6), and K.S.A. 60-2606. The district court summarily denied Kingsley’s motion, concluding his claims are foreclosed under the doctrine of res judicata.”
State v. Bailey, 510 P.3d 1160 (Kan. 2022). “He again filed the motion in 1988 CR 586, and this time labeled it as "Motion for Availability of Other Relief Pursuant to K.S.A. 60-2606." In it, he requested an evidentiary hearing to explore whether the DNA evidence could be located or, alternatively, to determine what…”
In Re Jones, 612 P.2d 1211 (Kan. 1980). “Finally, K.S.A. 60-2606 provides: "`If a case arises in which an action or proceeding for the enforcement or protection of a substantive right, or the redress or prevention of a wrong, cannot be had under any specific provisions of this chapter or other statutes then the court…”
State v. Sellers, 344 P.3d 950 (Kan. 2015). “299 Kan. 896 , Syl. ¶ 1. But Sellers’ argument focuses worthy attention on whether any earlier statement about tire exclusivity of the K.”
Goodpasture v. State (Kan. Ct. App. 2022). “60-260 and K.S.A. 60-2606. The district court denied Goodpasture's objections, reaffirming that it lacked jurisdiction over his motion.”
State v. Denney (Kan. Ct. App. 2021). “The ROA shows he simultaneously filed a motion that cited K.S.A. 60-2606 as the basis for relief. According to the State, the district court denied Denney's prior motion "upon finding that defendant was clearly making a claim for relief outside of K.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.