K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-4124 (2026)

Uniformity of application

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-4124. Uniformity of application. (a) The provisions of this act shall be applied and construed to effectuate its general purpose to make uniform law with respect to the subject of this act among states enacting the act.

(b) The attorney general is authorized to enter into reciprocal agreements with the attorney general or chief prosecuting attorney of any state to effectuate the purposes of this act.

(c) The provisions of this act shall apply when the act or acts giving rise to forfeiture occur after the effective date of this act.

History: L. 1994, ch. 339, § 24; July 1.


Previous | Next

www.ksrevisor.gov 2026
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1998–2006 · leading case: State v. U.S. Currency in the Amount of $3,743, 956 P.2d 1351 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. U.S. Currency in the Amount of $3,743, 956 P.2d 1351 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “K.S.A. 60-4124(c). Thus, the new Act has no application to this case.”
State v. 1997 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, 136 P.3d 496 (Kan. Ct. App. 2006). “” K.S.A. 60-4124. This case is distinguishable, however, in that Winkel did not travel to the location where she spoke with the informant for the purpose of conducting or finalizing a drug sale.”
— K.S.A. § 60-4124(c) — 1 case
State v. U.S. Currency in the Amount of $3,743, 956 P.2d 1351 (Kan. Ct. App. 1998). “K.S.A. 60-4124(c). Thus, the new Act has no application to this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.