60-438.
Admissibility of disclosure wrongfully compelled.
Evidence of a statement or other disclosure is inadmissible against the holder of the privilege if the judge finds that he or she had and claimed a privilege to refuse to make the disclosure but was nevertheless required to make it.
History:
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-438; January 1, 1964.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
1
case, 2018–2018 · leading case:
State v. Chighisola, 430 P.3d 996 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018).
State v. Chighisola, 430 P.3d 996 (Kan. Ct. App. 2018).
· cites it 3× “(4) Evidence of wrongful disclosure inadmissible against holder of privilege Finally, Chighisola alleges that the district court's reliance on the treatment facility privilege was improper under K.S.A. 60-438, which provides: "Evidence of a statement or other disclosure is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.