Kansas Statutes Annotated
K.S.A. § 60-507 (2026)
Unspecified real property actions
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
KS-LEGkslegislature.org
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
60-507. Unspecified real property actions. No action shall be maintained for the recovery of real property or for the determination of any adverse claim or interest therein, not provided for in this article, after fifteen (15) years from the time the cause of action accrued.
History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-507; January 1, 1964.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1952–2026 · leading case: Law v. Law Co. Bldg. Assocs., 289 P.3d 1066 (Kan. 2012).
Law v. Law Co. Bldg. Assocs., 289 P.3d 1066 (Kan. 2012). “60-511 and K.S.A. 60-507. They also argued: (1) Law was precluded from offering parol evidence of the Intermediate Draft; (2) Law’s claim for the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing should be dismissed because it failed to state a claim for which relief could be granted;…”
Hiji v. City of Garnett, 804 P.2d 950 (Kan. 1991). “60-503); (2) the fifteen-year period for unspecified real property actions (K.S.A. 60-507); (3) no statute of limitations (K.”
Oxy U.S. Inc. v. Red Wing Oil, LLC, 442 P.3d 504 (Kan. 2019). “As a result, this complex web of ownership claims boils down to a straightforward question: Can King enforce her reversionary interest in the minerals against the Luther Term Interest Holders, or is she now prevented from doing so by either a statute of limitation or by adverse…”
Ferrell v. Ferrell, 719 P.2d 1 (Kan. Ct. App. 1986). “The district court found that plaintiff s action was one to quiet title and not simply one for reformation of a deed and thus was timely under K.S.A. 60-507, which provides a fifteen-year statute of limitations period for quieting title.”
Kneller v. Fed. Land Bank of Wichita, 799 P.2d 485 (Kan. 1990). “K.S.A. 60-507 provides: "No action shall be maintained for the recovery of real property or for the determination of any adverse claim or interest therein, not provided for in this article, after fifteen (15) years from the time the cause of action accrued.”
Oxy USA, Inc. v. Red Wing Oil, LLC, 360 P.3d 457 (Kan. Ct. App. 2015). “But, since the court believed King or her predecessors should have been aware of their reversionary rights as of Smith in 1972, the court held that the 15-year statute of limitations under K.S.A. 60-507 barred enforcement of that reversionary interest.”
Deisher v. Kansas Dep't of Transp., 958 P.2d 656 (Kan. 1998). “K.S.A. 60-507. An appellate court’s review of questions of law is unlimited, and this court is not bound by the decision of the district court.”
Dennison v. Topeka Chambers Indus. Dev. Corp., 527 F. Supp. 611 (D. Kan. 1981). “§ 60-506 (2 year limit on forcible detention of real property); K.S.A. § 60-507 (15 year limit for unspecified real property transactions).”
Armstrong v. Cities Serv. Gas Co., 502 P.2d 672 (Kan. 1972). “" At this point it may be noted that "the other issues framed by the pre-trial order", mentioned in the trial court's memorandum, specifically included the defense of the statutes of limitations (K.S.A. 60-507, 60-508), as well as those of laches and estoppel.”
Wallace v. Magie, 522 P.2d 989 (Kan. 1974). “The foundation for the conclusion is found in K.S.A. 60-507, which provides: "No action shall be maintained for the recovery of real property or for the determination of any adverse claim or interest therein, .”
Sutton v. Sutton, 118 P.3d 700 (Kan. Ct. App. 2005). “60-513(a)(3), instead of the 15-year limitation period *358 for actions for recovery of real property, K.S.A. 60-507. We hold that although Shirley did not specifically plead for relief on the basis of fraud, her action is based on a conveyance of title perpetrated by alleged…”
Crawford v. Bd. of Johnson Cnty. Comm'rs., 776 P.2d 832 (Kan. Ct. App. 1989). “K.S.A. 60-507 provides a 15-year statute of limitations for the determination of any adverse claim to real property.”
— K.S.A. § 60-507(f)(1)(C) — 1 case
Hudgins v. State (Kan. Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.