K.S.A. » Chapter 60
Kansas Statutes Annotated

K.S.A. § 60-718 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section KS-LEGkslegislature.org JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

60-718.

History: L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-718; L. 1967, ch. 324, § 1; L. 1969, ch. 284, § 2; L. 1970, ch. 238, § 8; L. 1972, ch. 222, § 3; L. 1978, ch. 227, § 3; L. 1982, ch. 247, § 2; L. 1983, ch. 198, § 2; L. 1988, ch. 212, § 2; L. 1988, ch. 213, § 2; L. 1990, ch. 204, § 1; L. 1991, ch. 170, § 1; L. 1994, ch. 273, § 3; L. 1999, ch. 131, § 12; Repealed, L. 2002, ch. 198, § 19; July 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1978–2004 · leading case: Bergeson v. Dilworth, 749 F. Supp. 1555 (D. Kan. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bergeson v. Dilworth, 749 F. Supp. 1555 (D. Kan. 1990). · cites it 12× “State Farm filed a timely answer in accordance with K.S.A. § 60-718(a), and has prayed that plaintiff’s garnishment action be dismissed.”
Watson v. Jones, 610 P.2d 619 (Kan. 1980). · cites it 6× “See K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 60-718. The garnishee-insurer had pled the policy defense of noncooperation of its assured, Burley Jones.”
Capital Servs., Inc. v. Dahlinger Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc., 657 P.2d 36 (Kan. 1983). · cites it 12× “K.S.A. 60-718( a ) contains an answer form that may be used by a garnishee.”
Bartlett Coop. Ass'n v. Patton, 722 P.2d 551 (Kan. 1986). · cites it 5× “K.S.A. 60-718(a). The provision of the Code which is in issue in this case is K.”
Farm & City Ins. v. Johnson, 190 F. Supp. 2d 1232 (D. Kan. 2002). · cites it 4× “45 against the INS, both alleging failure to pay pursuant to the orders to pay, and seeking the full amount of plaintiffs judgment against Johnson pursuant to K.S.A. §§ 60-718 and 721. 2 USDA received the motion for judgment against it on October 16, 2001, and INS received the…”
DeTienne v. DeTienne, 815 F. Supp. 394 (D. Kan. 1993). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to K.S.A 60-718(a) (Supp. 1991), the garnishee shall file a verified answer to the order of garnishment within ten days after service (30 days pursuant to 42 U.”
Ortiz v. Biscanin, 122 P.3d 365 (Kan. Ct. App. 2004). “The court specifically finds that Guaranty did not file an answer to the garnishment, as required by K.S.A. 60-718. However, in view of the other findings and conclusions, the court determines that it need not rule further on Guaranty’s failure to file a timely answer, and does…”
Dailey v. Walden, 648 P.2d 258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 5× “The basis for this decision was that appellant Alice Walden had failed to timely object pursuant to K.S.A. 60-718(c) and because CACE took the realty subject to the garnishment.”
Finberg v. Sullivan, 634 F.2d 50 (3rd Cir. 1980). “Kan.Stat.Ann. § 60-718(a). The clerk must “promptly” serve copies of those answers on the creditor and debtor, id.”
Whisler v. Whisler, 684 P.2d 1025 (Kan. Ct. App. 1984). “60-717(b) (post- *628 judgment garnishment orders need not be served on defendant); K.S.A. 60-718(c) (defendant may controvert any statement in garnishee’s answer); K.”
Kansas Sand & Concrete, Inc. v. Lewis, 650 P.2d 718 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “The City contends that plaintiff’s reply controverting the City’s answer was not filed in a timely manner, and therefore the allegations of the answer are deemed to be confessed pursuant to K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-718(c), which provides in part: “(c) The clerk shall cause a copy of…”
Brown v. Tubbs, 582 P.2d 1165 (Kan. Ct. App. 1978). “Under K.S.A. 60-718(c), defendant had twenty days from the date of filing the garnishee’s answer in which to reply.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
— K.S.A. § 60-718(a) — 7 cases
Bergeson v. Dilworth, 749 F. Supp. 1555 (D. Kan. 1990). “State Farm filed a timely answer in accordance with K.S.A. § 60-718(a), and has prayed that plaintiff’s garnishment action be dismissed.”
Capital Servs., Inc. v. Dahlinger Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc., 657 P.2d 36 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 60-718( a ) contains an answer form that may be used by a garnishee.”
Finberg v. Sullivan, 634 F.2d 50 (3rd Cir. 1980). “Kan.Stat.Ann. § 60-718(a). The clerk must “promptly” serve copies of those answers on the creditor and debtor, id.”
Bartlett Coop. Ass'n v. Patton, 722 P.2d 551 (Kan. 1986). “K.S.A. 60-718(a). The provision of the Code which is in issue in this case is K.”
DeTienne v. DeTienne, 815 F. Supp. 394 (D. Kan. 1993). “Pursuant to K.S.A 60-718(a) (Supp. 1991), the garnishee shall file a verified answer to the order of garnishment within ten days after service (30 days pursuant to 42 U.”
— K.S.A. § 60-718(c) — 16 cases
Bergeson v. Dilworth, 749 F. Supp. 1555 (D. Kan. 1990). “State Farm filed a timely answer in accordance with K.S.A. § 60-718(a), and has prayed that plaintiff’s garnishment action be dismissed.”
Watson v. Jones, 610 P.2d 619 (Kan. 1980). “See K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 60-718. The garnishee-insurer had pled the policy defense of noncooperation of its assured, Burley Jones.”
Bartlett Coop. Ass'n v. Patton, 722 P.2d 551 (Kan. 1986). “K.S.A. 60-718(a). The provision of the Code which is in issue in this case is K.”
Capital Servs., Inc. v. Dahlinger Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc., 657 P.2d 36 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 60-718( a ) contains an answer form that may be used by a garnishee.”
Dailey v. Walden, 648 P.2d 258 (Kan. Ct. App. 1982). “The basis for this decision was that appellant Alice Walden had failed to timely object pursuant to K.S.A. 60-718(c) and because CACE took the realty subject to the garnishment.”
— K.S.A. § 60-718(o) — 1 case
Capital Servs., Inc. v. Dahlinger Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc., 657 P.2d 36 (Kan. 1983). “K.S.A. 60-718( a ) contains an answer form that may be used by a garnishee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.